While this form of argument probably works in whatever women’s studies program you are currently enrolled in, please be aware that you sound like an uneducated lunatic.

Yes. To get a little more precise, I am trusting the word of the person who has not said two completely different things under oath, which I thought was generally a pretty reasonable position.

On his side we have a tape of both Kesha and her mother testifying under oath that nothing happened. What are the details that are supposed to change my mind?

It’s public knowledge only if you get all your news from this site. In reality, there is no way of knowing whether or not he is guilty. You have the words of two different people, one of whom claimed nothing happened and is now saying she lied under oath. If you are the type of person who believes that all rape claims…

What about the “Ke$ha has admitted to lying to help her career” fact?

Yeah I’m some sort of crazy person who demands that there be some proof of a crime other than the word of a person who has already admitted to lying to help her career. Keep telling yourself that.

Not talking about a written right, just about how reasonable people in society should be acting. Not that you care about that.

What about men’s right not to be accused of an alleged decade-old crime based on one person’s word who had previously testified that nothing happened? Whether or not an assault occurred, I’m not sure of any system that would result in a conviction here.

Keisha either was not assaulted or lied under oath previously. Not sure why everyone is so keen to believe her now ten years later.

She has very little chance of winning any case anywhere because there is sworn video testimony of her saying that it didn’t happen.

Because the alleged assault occurred 11 years ago and there is sworn videotaped testimony of her saying that it didn’t happen.