PUH-LEEZ with this. She’s clinging to the “bitch” part because it’s the only tiny bit of the line that hasn’t been 100% confirmed approved. Do you really believe she was fine with him saying they might still have sex, because he made her famous, but “bitch” is where it crossed the line? That’s not at all what she…

Just scroll past, my friend! Obviously this article wasn’t directed at you. Go on and enjoy whatever it is you enjoy and leave us gossip luvin’ plebeians alone.

Right! The legality of the phone call wouldn’t even be an issue with the TS camp if it exposed Taylor’s side of the story as the truth. She’d probably be pleased that there was proof.

You pulled and bolded a summary of the law. That’s not what I was talking about when I said “the law” - I meant the exact section of the criminal code that you’re trying to infer the Kardashian-Wests have broken (which is included in there, but is not as clear cut).

The question isn’t whether there should or shouldn’t be a legal distinction. It’s: Look at the wording of the law. Does that create a legal distinction? No? Then there isn’t one. The law is not based on your feelings/opinions, unfortunately.