And how would you know that unless that means you're still stalking me? Seriously, you must be refreshing the page every few seconds. And now I will be reporting you.

So you asked me to leave you alone and stop "insulting" while you just now recommended a post which insulted me.

Your fucking creepy stalking is unsettling. Leave me the fuck alone.

That's why people don't take female violence nearly as seriously as they should. Because the victims tend to (statistically speaking) not go to the hospital as long or require as much care (this report compared the hospital bills).

Sigh, whatever. I'm not going to bother engaging with you. I've read plenty of your other posts. You're either a bitter, nasty ideologue with tunnel vision—one of the few feminists to whom the stereotypical slur "man-hater" could be justifiably applied—or you're just a troll stirring the pot. Either way you're not…

For sure. I love Jezebel and Isha's articles but, for example, the limp cigarette picture was in poor taste. If the genders were reversed there's no way in hell this article would be accompanied by, like, a picture of a snowman to symbolize frigidity.

Precisely. It's related to the old double-standard when it comes to violent crime: if a woman commits one, she must be unhinged, mentally ill, a victim of abuse, in need of therapy. If a man commits one, he's just an evil monster deserving of the harshest punishment.

I'm glad you brought this up, because I was feeling the same way. Not only would an MRA have a field day with this and use it as an example of a feminist double standard, but they'd actually be kind of right for a change. I know about systemic oppression and etc. when it comes to groups of people, and society has…

I agree that this isn't another Elliot Rodgers, but most of the article seems to have this tone of LOL GIRL, SLOW YOUR CRAZY ROLL oh btw this is bad, and I think it's just really irresponsible to have this tone of LOL YOU ABUSERS AND YOUR WACKY HIJINKS in any story about domestic violence.

And people immediately jump to the "well, she was crazy as fuck, so let's move on already" defense, while every male perpetrator in similar circumstances would clearly have been an exponent of the patriarchy, worthy of many long feminist essays.

But a lot of comments are making light of it and making jokes. If the genders were reversed, not a single feminist/liberal here would be joking about it.

And the other half aren't stupids jokes right?

That's what I'm saying. In stories where a man shoots a woman because she won't have sex with him or won't have "the right kind" of sex with him, people (including mr sometimes) talk about how this is an extreme outcome of male sexual entitlement. Elliot Rodger is the most obvious current example. So it would be…

I agree. Reading this article, until the very end I could picture the author shaking her head and chuckling, like "What? Girl, you're pretty loopy LOL." Then at the end there was a brief lecture on communicating with one's SO over sexual dissatisfaction, and no mention of how horrific this act was until the very last…

Why the hell did you have to drag Elliott Rodger into this? His horrible crime had absolutely no parallels to this one.

This place is full of Hypocrite. Every time a men is victim of violence committed by women, cEveryone here start making stupid jokes as if it's funny.

Yeah…… I know Jez is meant to be less serious than a news site, and I'm not usually part of the WHAT ABOUT THE MENZ crowd, but I think there's no denying this article would have had a completely different tone if a man had shot a woman over sex. Can we not do that anymore?

Stop stalking me, creep.

My mom was cool about interracial dating (she did it a lot herself) but there are some family members that are not. I hate that people still think this way.

I was told that a white guy might call me a nigger so best not to date them. My counterpoint was, "But calling my black husband 'nigga' is ok like I hear my aunties do?"