Weird, right? Here's what our tipster says:

Oh, that's adorable! How many times are you planning on editing that comment? You will come across as a humorless prick no matter what.

I owned a 745Li from 2007 to 2014. It was a wonderful road trip car and astonishingly capable. But I would never recommend one and I don't think this article covers it.

You just linked me my source? Ok then. Let me tell you how this works since I've used it for years. The auto companies only need to report where the majority of the car's content comes from. Say a vehicle has 60% content from 2 separate countries. A theoretical 42% is supplied from USA content and 18% is supplied from…

Step 1: Buy 7-Series

I like seeing these smoke, makes my fintail feel better about itself.

Many didn't use Takata. Others use more average quality suppliers, not the cheapest possibly available. To add context, Toyota uses an average of about 10% Chinese content, Hyundai/ Kia uses about 5% (most from Korea), Nissan uses an average of about 15% excluding Infiniti, and GM and Ford both use about 20%- 25%…

I'm really glad we've spent so much taxpayer money defending (haha get it?) our citizens from these dangerous foreign vehicles.

It IS different from many companies. A great example (of many) is the Takata recall. Those were the cheapest safety suppliers available at the time. Notice who used them. Part of economics in a proper business model is knowing that if you provide a good product, people will react. This assumes there is no bias. Honda…

Not sure why Mitsubishi is sucking so hard in the US. Make an Eclipse that isn't awful, make 3 trim levels of the Lancer (base, Evo, and something neat in-between), bring back a small pickup (segment is very underrepresented in the US), and an SUV. Sales problems solved.

I'm negative toward them in a logical way. Do you want me to explain what they did to some of my family and friends, and where they source most of their parts from? A hint is that it's from the cheapest possible suppliers on Earth. I could also tell you about the absolute weasel assholes that run Honda North America…

So, a company that sticks to using the same suspensions and engine tech for 20 years on the majority of their products are some of the most technologically advanced cars? No. The only reason they are reliable is their use of relatively simple and proven tech.

Looks almost exactly like the old Nissan Z concept

You seem to be defending Honda in an unhealthy way. There is still no excuse for the shortcomings. Honda has become careless about product integrity. They cut corners not because it translates into cheaper ownership, but because they try to squeeze every cent out of their mass-produced production; they even do it if…

bit different concept, that's a turbo for shear lunacy, not to downsize the engine to please the tree huggers.

There is plenty of plausible variation left to design a vehicle many ways and still meet the target Cd numbers.

Ughhh, BMW reliability...rather have a Mercedes Benz...