Look at it this way, at least she's the comercially attractive progressive pill in the Fox News dog food.
Mr.NonConfrontational
w00dlee
She is so hawt!
You're just determined to ruin this for me aren't'cha!?
It sure did...
You sound like a typical white male feminist looking for a cookie.
I bet I do have a problem with how you define "feminine"
Feminine Women. Do you have a problem with feminine women?
Nooo body knoooows da' troubles I've seeen... and whats wrong with feminine women? I just don't get you.
Greta Van Sustere & Meygn Kelly are respected journalist and honored graduates with prestigious law degrees, but to you they're just eye candy for old crusty white segregationist. Sad..& ironicly sexist.
Paragraph 2 incoherent word salad. Next!
_ And as I've said, when the demographic has *only* one choice, you cannot use that single option as evidence that they're getting exactly what they want and only what they want.
_Why are you incapable of understanding that legal and cultural habits will limit supply and demand beyond the pure machinations of "capitalism"?
I asked this before and I'll ask it again,
_"Christian Science"?
You're trying to eat your cake and have it too. They don't give out prizes for cynicism.
Why should he stop defending her? He could do what ever he wants.
_"You're incapable of understanding very simple points that are perfectly germane to the discussion."
_If no people of color are given an opportunity to succeed, of course they won't succeed.
Deus ex machina!?.... I don't think that word means what you think it means.