Yes, I think it is a 2011+ Sonata. The bottom character line is distinctive as others have mentioned. And if you look at tail-light maybe it is reflecting like this. The refreshed (2015) Sonata has the tail-light extending a bit on to the side, the older one has just a reflector as you can see in the picture.

I think you mean ES350. The car in the photo you provided is an ES.

These things lease really well when you compare them to an X5 (NOT the GLE which is the best lease in class).

When you are leasing it’s different. The Range Rover is exactly double ($1000/month + with 0 down). I also imagine when purchasing you will receive a hefty discount on the Grand Cherokee and not much on the highly demanded Rover.

Good point. 3.0L naturally aspirated V10 would be a good fit then. And something tells me the development cost will be low.

Red Bull bought a track and brought it back to the calendar. Meanwhile, Ferrari and Mercedes aren’t prepared to spend a dime to save their home races. And don’t forget that Ferrari and Monza have been in F1 since 1950. I suggest you understand Red Bull’s contribution to Formula 1 before dismissing it.

Yes, but not quite there. Do you know what I mean? Like Ferrari this year. But as Monza proved, when it needed to, Mercedes had enough pace to cover a possible 25 second penalty. I was almost expecting Sebastian to be depressed after finishing second in such a way.

I agree with you and believe Mercedes deserved all the success it had in 2014. Renault definitely deserves its losses and the criticism from Red Bull. There shouldn’t have been tokens at all in the first 3 years. Okay fine have tokens in the first year to reward the best prepared engine manufacturer, but after that it…

A 2.5L twin turbo V10 with no fuel flow limit would sound wonderful. We should also give the teams more engines per season so they’re always running at full whack.

Red Bull wouldn’t be whining so much if it actually had a chance of closing the gap. It truly is restricted by the engine formula. Because we all know Ferrari would be a distant third to Mercedes and Red Bull if the engines were close in performance. From 2010-2013 Ferrari was beaten by the aero of Red Bull, and it…

LAND CRUISER. LAND CRUISER. LAND CRUISER. LAND CRUISER. LAND CRUISER.

This looks pretty similar to me. It has as much differentiation between them as the new E and current S do.

It doesn’t appear so on first glance, but if you drive an S class long enough and the only way you’ll go down to an E is kicking and screaming.

I love Lexus dealerships. It’s a major reason I’d consider getting an LX but I think I’ll just buy a cruiser in a few years and be the asshole who gets it serviced at a Lexus dealership. No AHC maintenance for me!

This is why you need to lease a full size SUV! Range Rover even uses this as a selling point of leasing their SUV over an S class on their website.

Maybe a little over $700 but definitely possible.

Mercury Villager - Nautica Edition

I think it’s blown out of proportion namely because GM mishandled the whole situation and left a lot of people sour. I have one that is right in window of the valve problem engines, it has been fine so far.

You are right the laptimes don’t matter. What really matters is you are getting an LS7 engine. That is the main reason to get a Z28 over a Vette. I have a c6 z06 and would choose the Camaro for that glorious engine.

Forget about power, I’d like to see what the real world fuel economy is when a turbo 2.5 liter engine is hustling 4000+ lbs around the suburbs.