voxreaderturnedjezeballer
Voxreaderturnedjezeballer
voxreaderturnedjezeballer

I did read the study, but you are just heroing yourself. If a female teacher deigns that a boy is “proper” she gives him better grades. But otherwise? From birth a crying boy is “angry” and a crying girl is “sad.” We have all sat in classrooms where girls talk with impunity but boys are being “loud” and “rude” for the

They aren’t hard to find.

Prove it.

Well, per departmental policy, I rarely give out solid As, and last semester I gave out more to men than to women, so no (memory is iffy but it was probably 3 or 4 As to men and 2 to women).

Young boys are so often taught by society to feel superior to others and to overestimate their own academic achievements.

THIS! OMG I am tired of “Grades this grades that.” “Grades” are not handed out evenly and fantastic bias exists in who gets what grades. Black boys especially get shafted by this, just having a black male name on your paper is going to get you fucking canned in grades.

Did you read what you cited? Boys who did not match teachers patterns of behavior were downgraded.

I’ve been trying to say this. I mean from Ashley’s first line:

Or do women think they are smarter then men because the system is designed to reward women and women don’t recognize that?

I teach in the humanities and see a lot of unearned confidence from my male students,

A new study affirms what many of us already know to be true: Men have an inflated sense of intelligence over women that hasn’t been earned.

But this has been brought up before, by people before you, and he has addressed it multiple times. You aren’t “holding someone to account” here, that was already done before, and more than once.

Yah totes wrong. Heck Hamm didn’t even do it right. If you don’t commit at least two felony assaults is it really mischief?

I mean if Iraq had not been re-armed with US weapons it would have just bought Russian. Besides, as the article pointed out we didn’t even give them the good stuff.

We do, but they aren’t fool proof. Literally nothing is.

It’s actually by design though. German and Russian tanks run on simple diesel engines using diesel fuel, which makes them durable and easy to fuel.

That is what is really missing from this conversation: these tanks, while terrifying, aren’t very durable in the long run without constant maintenance. Its actually intended that way: captured US equipment can seldom be maintained by foreign forces. Sure, they may get a good battle or two, but afterwards? The Abrams

He’s a culture thief. He brings nothing to the community.