Interesting. Essentially what this says is that they are still treated as undocumented immigrants in terms of being able to apply for citizenship, residency or benefits but have a get out of deportation free card.
Interesting. Essentially what this says is that they are still treated as undocumented immigrants in terms of being able to apply for citizenship, residency or benefits but have a get out of deportation free card.
I don’t see how that would have stopped them from going through the normal process. Some of them have had decades to do the paperwork according to the article so lack of time is not the issue. They have also been living and working inside the United States the whole time, quite possibly with additional funding from…
Out of curiosity why haven’t they applied for citizenship by now?
So, realizing that since the NFL Player protests started it hasn’t been paying to advertise at NFL games makes you a dangerous racist? Seriously?
Depends, verbal agreements can be binding contracts, breaking them can lead to penalties.
(Tapper said that “Allahu Akbar” is “used under the most beautiful circumstances,” which is an indisputable fact.)
“have colluded to deprive Mr. Kaepernick of employment rights in retaliation for Mr. Kaepernick’s leadership and advocacy for equality and social justice and his bringing awareness to peculiar institutions still undermining racial equality in the United States.”
So you are saying you are not surprised that the democratic party has less moral backbone and is more corrupt than the Republican party?
He/she/it targeted me specifically with their argument and did not choose to counter any of the points made. By your definition and that of my professor’s and the textbooks that is an Ad Hominem attack.
Agreed, in terms of the young lady, I think she is out of the woods save for complications that would have occurred regardless.
The implication that I am a racist or support laws that have been struck down.
I don’t really care about the legal accuracy. I like to have words that are true or at least accurate rather than words that are chosen solely to stir controversy and inflame. I suppose that is also a matter of legal accuracy though because words chosen and used for that purpose are in fact a potential crime, inciting…
Not my opinion, just something I had to learn in the course of day to day work which involved lawyers.
What the actual Hell.
All documents made publically available are legal documents. Any private documents can be as well by subpoena. They are documentation of mindset, intentions and potentially actions that were taken.
I was willing to deal with your false equivalency politely. I will not justify an ad hominem the same way. Unless you wish to be articulate, civil and apply some logic to your arguments good day.
People who are racist against people of color are racist against particular groups, those with what might be described as sallow skin for instance.
That is a type of poll tax and is a different matter entirely. You should know this.
That works, though as a means for filing legal challenges it doesn’t work very well since by definition all laws regarding transfers of anyone or anything between nations is to some degree xenophobic unless it is a complete lack of regulation.
I was going to complain about you picking the least flattering image of her to balance your accusations in hopes of avoiding a suit from the offender. Then I did an image search for her, carry on.