I guess the process didn't work on Dee Snider.
I guess the process didn't work on Dee Snider.
Officially it's seven, but I've seen video of him saying it might go to 8.
Agreed. So what if it has 5 books?? That only mean it's the biggest trilogy EVAH!!!
I really enjoyed watching the show. I only wish the show had its own stories. I come everyday to io9 and either read or skim 95% of the articles. That would make watching it a little bit redundant, imho. I'd still watch it though...
Someone else already explained what it is. I guess, since it's not medical or a biological term, and its similarity to other terms which actually are bullshit, confused me.
Even the most controlled herbal medicine, only guarantees x milligrams of the plant or fungus it is selling. They can't guarantee how much of the active principle exists on the pill.
What the heck is "parasitic power loss"??? Sounds like mystic bullshit to me.
Scientific medicine does not dismiss anything. All it asks is evidence that a proposed treatment works. Many of the stuff you find on traditional pharmacies is the industrialized version of a traditional medicine, the difference being that you can trust when it says x milligrams per capsule or similar, unlike herbal…
Spider-Man was allways meant as an open ended series of adventures.
You don't need one, and he still used it. Shows how poor the quality of the movie is.
The only profound thing about "Super Size Me" was the profoundly flawed scientific methodology Spurlock used in his attempt to show McD food is bad for your health.
The one on the right is Thomas Jane.
From now on I'll try to read with Gilbert Godfried voice in my mind. Should make things more interesting, no matter what I'm reading.
It's his name that sells the books, so it's only understandable.
Charlie Jane, why don't you do this type of article every month? It's my absolute favorite thing about io9: book sugestions.
Yeah, sure.
What else did you put in the shelf?
I'm glad the wikipedia page says it, so here is a quote from it "there is no scientific evidence that any of the foods claimed as negative calorie foods are such"
What you're talking about, Frank, is physics, and in that you're totally right.