Hey come on now, he may be a stupid, vile, racist, misogynist, hateful, exploitative fuck who deserves to spend a few centuries in each individual level of Dante's vision of hell, but that's just too far.

Woah woah woah, let's not go around tossing around wild accusations!

You know what's weird? Your first paragraph.

+1

Careful, Tim, you wouldn't want to damage his sterling reputation.

So basically David Stern vetoed the Chris Paul trade to the Lakers so that his good pal could add another "young black body" to his stable. Fuck David Stern.

Fuck this motherfucker. I bet he likes Kinja too.

Yes. You are right. Donald Sterling's virulent racism, well-documented over many decades of public life, is the fault of his biracial mistress.

Eh, even pathetic people deserve empathy. And besides, he can literally ruin her life if he chooses too. Obviously racist accusations aren't anything new with Sterling, so how's one more going to affect him? On the other hand, he can sue her for defamation of character or slander. I'm not an expert on legal matters,…

At first, listening in on their conversation felt very strange. But wow, it's fascinating the way this discussion/conversation/argument goes. Sterling is incredibly good at manipulating her emotions. the first couple of minutes are just nonsensical ramblings of an old racist who doesn't understand that other races…

Rich Peverley once had a natural hat trick after taking an elbow to the throat.

My favorite thing of this entire season was the media convincing themselves that the Pacers were actually title contenders and that Roy Hibbert was actually a good player.

Knock knock.

Shut the fuck up.

1. He claimed they had no sexual contact. Then, they found his jizz up her ass. Then, he claimed he had consensual sex.

"She wakes up remembering only the puking part, but somehow she just "knows" that the sex wasn't consensual?"

That's not a convincing argument. Let me demonstrate by analogy: I haven't seen the results of any official tests, but I can state with great confidence that you are a blithering idiot.

It should go without saying that if someone is too intoxicated to remember an event, they're also too intoxicated to consent.

...does it internally register to you that, in posting that, you've both posited yourself as an irredeemable piece of shit and you've managed to contribute nothing to the discourse?