Is there anywhere we can submit future article ideas? My two would go:

Did you at least get to destroy some triremes? (in the interests of full disclosure I have no idea if AoE 2 had triremes).

:: Throws some Jack across the Atlantic ::

I would think a lot of people would respond to this memory with games they got as kids ;-)

Someone got me Myst when I was way too young for it. I remember feeling angry and confused.

Spot (I.M) the problems with it ;-)

1) Does anyone know if anyone has agreed to buy Univision yet? (it seems like it would be like agreeing to buy The Bluth Company at this point but still)

You for over a day now ;-) Or at least that’s the effect when someone posts that it is somehow worse to do this to an employee than a random person.

It’s a sidenote but does anyone else ever wonder what they might have been like sexually if they hadn’t been buried in religious hangups from age 0?

And my point is that doing this to anyone is not great.

Yes.

This all feels too much like minimising what C.K did to me. I don’t understand the impulse.

Yep. Happened where I grew up in the UK. Our headteacher had been sleeping with 14 year old girls in his original job at a secondary school so the school authorities (Catholic School) moved him to the local primary school and hushed it up. I think the “logic” went something like “he won’t be tempted by younger…

This is making me picture a whole series:

I’m sure he’ll go with something different. Maybe that nasty chicken meal McDs sold to promote The Hunchback of Notre Dame?

This is what happens when people stop writing by hand and have ready access to spellcheck. Most of them think spellcheck is enough.

I wonder how the Everyhing Must Go sale is going. Come for the clickbait, stay for the few decent writers we have not yet fired or completely demoralised......

The thing that personally depresses me more than the inevitable people who abuse the power they get are the masses of people who will defend them for whatever reason and also the people who know what is going on but turn a blind eye or clsoe ranks to protect their own power.

I think this is a really spurious argument. He had more power in the comedy world than pretty much any of these women and it was always going to be hard for them to avoid him/call this behaviour out without it wrecking their own careers. I don’t get why saying “but they didn’t technically work for him” makes what he…

What Chloe Dyskstra described was domestic abuse. But it can be hard to prove and as this comments section shows a lot of people will do all kinds of mental gymnastics to defend the perp and attack the victim, even when the accused person has admitted misconduct as in Louis C.K’s case.