I would totally love to buy this.

What message does it send exactly, and does the gender of the person sending it effect what is received in said message?

Least he has his priorities straight.

I don’t understand why he’d love charts, I’m pretty sure he can’t read them.

I’ve watched 7 kids born in the delivery room, and held dozens of newborns and infants from my own kids to family members.

Pretty sure nobody in trumps campaign, including him, have any sense of logic... morals. Or ability to not subject women, and ethnic groups to disturbing beliefs and actions.

Omg...

That’s no surprise.

That’s a good point, another brought that up too.

True.. That’s pretty much me... It makes me excessively self-conscious as it is. But I can’t fix my body, face, and voice overnight. (Much to my desire to do so)

I bring my own hand sanitizer with me so I don’t have to linger at the sink, because I worry about making others feel uncomfortable. :/ Even though my state legally allows me to be there, I still worry for other women’s comfort when I’m in there. (part of why I don’t talk.)

Please god tell me the latter is verifiable!!

The hell?!?!?!!!

Or maybe your 14 words are just lacking concept.

Your post doesn’t make any sense hun.

It’s not really, because it’s not babysitting. You’re taking a proactive step to attempt to curb dangerous activity, it’s little different in practice then how people with DUI’s on their record have devices to keep their car from starting at all if it detects alcohol.

Sometimes we have to deal with annoyances and place measures to protect the masses, from the people who just don’t have a brain, and i’d be ok with that if it meant i can worry less about a fool who doesn’t notice me or my family because pokemon go (I wouldn’t object to phones doing it automatically either to…

Judges can interpret laws though, this is an insanely clear violation of a woman’s privacy, I would argue it almost pushes into sexual violation. The law can be stretched far enough to cover this situation without much loss of context because it is exactly that: A major violation of privacy, potentially verging on…

So in order to get action to be taken, a threat of violence has to be against more than 1 person, or against a (famous) company. Because this same thing against a woman or a man, or a few women, probably would not have been looked into any. (Potentially forcing said person to flee their home with their family to…

“I’m not a bad person.”