For the most part I’ve given up replying to these posts, nobody wants to listen, so nobody’s reading it.

No I’ve not read the study, size is irrelevant to the point. Even if some women report such coercion, it’s STILL BAD!! But by listening to other women you can learn quite easily: This is not an isolated thing, this is widespread for a countless number of women.

Thank you^^ But that isn’t necessary hun^^
The amount of people who ignore such simple things is stunning... esp that Danzman guy below. I don’t take pride in being right on this ><

It’s a coercive power dynamic, so yeah.
If you’re just having sex with them because you’re in a relationship/married, but not really wanting to do it, it kind of is, there’s a power dynamic there. Maybe they aren’t in fear for their lives or safety, or maybe they are, plenty of abused women in the world, and sexually…

Well, it’s simple, ask for permission, Get a firm but happy: YES, and don’t pressure her about it, or make her feel bad for refusing if she does.

Are women qualified to govern their preferences and behaviour? Absolutely. I never said or felt otherwise.

Participants said that faking orgasm was one way of exerting more control and getting out of sex when there didn’t seem to be other options available.

I’ve little knowledge on how it works, beyond the fact they’re the ones who control if our world crumbles and dies all on foolish gambles (Like the banks did), I’m not good with such economics. But if that’s how modern investing works, modern investing sounds twitchy.

Twitchy wall street investors may not be the right bunch for medical science, or science in general if a setback makes it plummet. Setbacks are bound to happen in scientific research, that’s just a given, and should be expected by investors.

But it would change a lot of other people’s sadly. They (most likely trump supporters) would use it as ammo against black people saying they’re all monsters, and they wouldn’t care if they were right or not. (Quadruply so if it was a muslim radical...)

Maybe with our own 2 eyes in person. But there’s other ways to see those things, whether we have the technology now is another story though.

My handshake is pretty weak if you want to measure strength, i don’t put much strength into it, because, why would I want to try and crush someone’s hand to say hello??

I just assume everything in our food supply is crap and will probably kill me in one way or another. But damn if some of it isn’t the greatest tasting food ^^ (Cake esp... and frosting.... thanks to my wife figuring out how to make it without causing anaphylactic shock from eggs.)

It’s more a combination of what the company will accept for the service or object, and what the maximum the consumer is willing to pay. Problem becomes a few things, and probably another or 2 i can’t recall off the top of my head, it slipped away ><

Considering most goes into their pockets and not to the infrastructure to support expanded and cheaper services, probably a lot less than we do now. Not to mention, we pay some of the highest prices for the lowest bandwidth around the world. (Maybe not THE highest, but pretty bloody high none the less.)

Greed.
Esp in the US. :/

NC was just pulling the trigger in the general direction of anything moving, usually killed whoever was there in one shot.

Least it wasn’t a controller, though that probably cost less than the racket, though the racket would be less messy.

It could be he was hoping to taunt her to shooting him instead of someone else... Like their daughters ;; It’s not the greatest thing to say, but I can see a bit of logic in it.

If there is a God of infinite intelligence, I would believe he’s above petty reasons to send people into eternal hell