vinylrake1
vinylrake
vinylrake1

get serious. it wasn’t one comment or one incident- as she said, it’s a daily, constant flow of harrassing, uninvited sexualized comments.

so to address you ‘question’ (let’s pretend it’s an actual question and not a troll camouflaged as a hypothetical), yes if you get mugged multiple times a day by the same group

Clearly she was right, men (on the internet at least) ARE trash.

And there’s the strawman fallacy, right on schedule.

True, you make a good case for the merits of an argument standing on it’s own - independent from it’s source, and I agree - but I didn’t say that anyone’s argument was invalid because of their behavior or personal attributes, just that I thought it was a waste of

It is hard not to see traces of what almost appear to be a certain perverse pride and protectionism around the holocaust and issues related to it. 

Best comment in this thread.

Using “Concentration camp” to refer to what is literally, in every sense of the word a ‘concentration camp” is NOT controversial. The only people who find this ‘controversial’ are people who are ignorant of what a concentration camp is (ignorant in the ‘not knowing’ sense, not the stupid sense) and people who are

Or maybe they realized that he was talking about the current supreme leader of Iran, Ali Khomeini who is a Shī‘ah cleric so would have the title of “Ayatollah”, so “Ayatollah Khomeini” is actually the name of the top ranking official in the Iranian government.

The current supreme leader of Iran is Ali Khomeini. “Ayatollah” is a title for a high ranking Shī‘ah cleric so if Trump meant to refer to the president he mistakenly used the name of the supreme leader, but if he was talking about sanctions against the Iranian leadership, “Ayatollah Khomeini” seems valid since the

“Ayatollah Khomeini” jumped out at me too when I heard it for all the same historically associated reasons, but I assume he was referring to the current supreme leader of Iran, Ali Khamenei. “Ayatollah” is (afaik) a title for a high ranking Shiite cleric, so guessing maybe Trump’s reference was accurate in this case..

Counterpoint: Having a catgirl avatar was a useful litmus test in determing who was worth spending your time arguing with.

While that’s true, what’s scarier to me is the corollary - that these people have spent so long imitating a dog getting busy on a human’s leg, they can’t even imagine that there are perfectly valid reasons to hate the POLICIES and ACTIONS the government is taking - they think ALL criticism is derived from a

yeah, out of all the responses our tiny-fingered orangefuhrer could come up with, ‘she’s not my type’ has to be in the top 3 list of most incriminating responses possible.

And your comment sounds really ignorant of the causes of suicide. When someone says ‘life gets better’ that doesn’t mean unicorns and rainbows and a perfect life, it just means that you won’t always feel so bad that suicide feels like your only solution to the pain you are currently in. Suicide is caused by feelings

It’s not that they actually actively look like twins, it’s just that the soul plays a large part in how people look, and since these two have no souls, they passively look alike in the same way not-yet-fully formed embryos look alike.

Most of the rest is pure absurdity (in the best sense of the word), but I thought the rotating trap door was actually kind of brilliant.


Not an AOC fan boi, but reading what she actually said, she didn’t do or say anything wrong, The faux histronics by her critics are either just incredibly partisan attempts to drum up controversy where there is none, or pretty damning evidence that her critics are ignorant and complete fucking morons.

“...Amofah was again taken into the metal ward of a hospital...”

This is a very funny comment. Subtle, but funny. I enjoyed the twists and turns.

I am praying that you don’t mean ‘wet noodle’ as a euphemism and oh oh wait excuse me now I have to go and pour some bleach onto my brain to erase the imagery typing that brought to mind.

I’ve long thought that solution for US politics would be to have more significant parties in the mix, but that would only get around the problem (for a while at least) of both parties working together to keep other parties out so they have more control and can do less because there’s no alternative. I think the