half of a plutonium bomb casing

Steve’ s absolutely correct about your insurance company denying coverage to anyone who lied on the policy application as to where the vehicle was garaged and used. This is a serious violation of your policy’s conditions.

I would include Chasing Classic Cars; I like Wayne but really love Roger. I think someone should do a regular one hour show with Roger talking about his racing experiences, maybe have regular interview with Other racers of his era.

I’d go with a mid 60’s Chev or Mopar; relative speaking, they were simple, easy to maintain & repair. Shade tree mechanics required very few specialized tools to effect most repairs. If I weren't concerned about maintenance or complexity, I'd go with a 2015 Jeep, either Wrangler or Cherokee.

Not only is this this grin worthy to drive, but it challenges your ability to go out and come back home. There is a reason that the Brits and Brit car drivers fear the name Lucas!

Disagree on roof slope. Why give up 2nd seat headroom and storage for “esthetics”? A straight run back would be much more efficient and, in my opinion, better looking albeit more conventional.

This is exactly the point I think a court could find troubling. Mecum holds themselves out to be experts, selling high end classic cars. Their ads proclaim them to have the best cars at auction. It’s nonsense to expect a lay person not to rely on Mecum for something so obvious that a bystander spotted the fake while…

Greg, see my response above. You should be reimbursed your deductible if your insurer gets paid by them. BUT you have to pursue the claim for personal items yourself. Call your comprehensive insurance adjuster, he/she will walk you through filing a claim against GM.

And if/when your insurance company does get reimbursed by GM, you’ll be reimbursed your deductible. You will need to file a separate claim with GM for any personal property lost; the rep should be able to give you GM’s liability insurer contact info. Otherwise, your own comprehensive insurer will get it it for you.…

This story makes it seem as though Mazda replaced the car gratis, which I find hard to believe. I imagine that either the owners or the at fault party’s insurer agreed to pay for a new car. (Having less than 1 mile on the odometer, most states would not allow for any depreciation being taken). The dealer & Mazda…

Had an ‘09 Santa Fe, good car, decent handling with great cabin. When I was ready to replace it, found new Santa Fe’s were starting at mid $30’s. Bought a 2015 Cherokee instead. If they want to sell cars, they need to rein in the price.

I suggest programs where they really restore cars, not stand around in fake cat fights. Make the cars the stars, not egotistical shop owners. Do away with the phony drama, show backyard mechanics doing what they love.

Roger is definitely someone I would love to meet & talk to. Love listening to his stories. Wayne Carrini is on of the most interesting people on TV and his show is the best!

Because you're not female or elderly.

Couldn’t disagree more, cool is in the eye of the beholder, and to me he counts. 1. Works on and drives his cars, doesn’t warehouse them for the investment value; 2. Has great car show where he talks intelligently to real car people, 3 respects the cars he has and doesn’t destroy doing stupid stuff, 4. Wears rumpled…

Hey, how about a couple of Spads, maybe even a Sopwith Camel, as long as we’re traveling back in time to re-use old aircraft. I’m sure there’s a few Liberators or Forts available.

Seriously ugly! Looks like a grade school kids project, too Gee-Whizz

Pro: good handling, not fast, but quick. Con: serious reliability issues.

I say this because I used to be one of these middle schoolers. Back when I was a wee lad of merely 13 or 14, I joined a car forum and told everyone that I was actually a guy in his thirties who owned an oil field and drove a wide variety of cool cars. Normally this would've thrown up an instant red flag, and nobody…

You're right, but the premiums are based upon recognized risk factors such as age, sex, miles driven and past behavior (accidents, moving violations, etc). Thus computer operated vehicles, theoretically would have substantially lower premiums and lower income for insurers.