You better have skinny legs and a skinny waist to go with that big ass though, or else GTFO, right?

Ok, so, I watched this entire ordeal go down on Twitter last night. I'm all for holding assholes accountable for shit, but you only included the one tweet where he said "a million apologies." You didn't include the probably hundreds of other tweets he sent throughout the entire night, apologizing to almost every…

It's not appropriate...it's DiGiorno!

Unfortunately I feel like this firing could enrage him more. He may start to blame her for him losing his career.

Oh? A Polish Jew did it?

So growing up, my sister and I cooked all the meals, and Daddy and my brother covered their food in ketchup and salt without first tasting. Every. Damn. Meal. It got pretty demoralizing, because we took the cooking seriously and made some amazing meals together. Including our masterpiece—a meatloaf that was mainly…

"Tomorrow's my last day at Jez, y'all"

I saw a man piss his pants on the bus earlier, and this is still the least sexy thing I've seen today.

Your audience, right now. Bottom right: Me.

Here's the section I was looking for. I also don't eat pork for religious reasons, and one of the things I've noticed I have to be vigilant about is soups, particularly New England Clam chowder because some restaurants add bacon for some reason, and Split Pea Soup which sometimes has ham. I usually ask before I…

Lawrence's lawyers or the porn site's lawyers are 100% ignorant on this issue then. Her lawyer MUST submit a DMCA claim. That's the law. It is very simple, they must include all required facilities of the DMCA in the DMCA notification to the porn site. From there it's essentially prescriptive.

I can't fathom why anyone would think eating 13 tons of garlic would be a solid date-impressing plan. I mean, usually people want to impress their dates so that they can get laid (or at least kissed) at the end. I can tell you none of that would be happening with a guy who just ate two pans of just roasted garlic, no…

honestly, I think I behaved coolly in this exchange. I think it is Pinkham who is being a brat.

1. The article at first read, "fish poached in wax paper." the author changed it after getting called out in the comments section.

Yeah, I was totally unfamiliar with the presentation. The article does not label the picture at all. There is no "see above." When I clicked on the article, I glanced at the picture, and immediately started reading the text. I did not think, "gee, I wonder if that picture I glanced at is referring to the first…

Ah, I see now. It is pictured at the top of this article. Thanks for explaining that, but I wish you hadn't been so condescending in your reply to me.

Yes, but I was popping in to say the same, lest some Kitchenette reader try to steam fish in wax paper and complain that it tastes like a melted birthday candle. Because I care.

Dude! Did you just fat shame a wombat!?!?!

Honestly, I'm kind of siding with the bacon supporters here. I'm Jewish and don't eat pork, but who cares? How is a sign advertising a food beloved by those who have different beliefs than me offensive?