scuse me?

Wait, people still do this kind of media frequency counting content analysis? I thought we had all come to realise it was ridiculous: I remember when the OC came out and researcuers did this kind of bullshit and said all the depictions of drugs and drinking and guns were going to harm the impressionable kids who…

yeah, i got a buddy named shahid, and spelling could be closer with others too because arabic-english transliteration varies ... but yeah, it ain't south asian. kinda bums me out that people on this site don't tend to know shit bout india, asia and the middle east.

yeah, it ain't, soz.

yep. send in the klowns.

uh oh. english is germanik too!

Don't do it please, mate, obviously. What's the issue, anyway?

I'm down with a lot of the feminism going on here on Jezebel, actually—-but yeah, your point is spot on: nobody seems to want to get into the moral relativism, despite the super-duper partiarchal nature of the political viewpoint they tend to push. At the end of the day, the Russians still screw the toilet seat on…

I'm fine with articles critical of other countries, but this article has a whole "they're just so backwards" thing that feels like a hangover from the Cold War.

This article and many of the comments are absolutely laced with a kind of cultural imperalism I'm saddened to read on Jezebel. Backward foreign toilets (common around the globe) aren't good enough for our Dignified English-speaking Olympians? Greeks are so lazy they strike for 'naptime', not realising how hard we work…

Are you serious? Other than NORTH AMERICA? Yeah, disregard most of Europe, Australia, New Zealand, Japan, Korea ... nobody but you guys is civilised to flush their toilet paper.

Are you fat?

yes! i'm so sick of everybody talking about hard-wired brain anything. i'd gladly forfeit the expression if everyone else had to.

I like APA, but come on, this was just insane. In the selected quotes alone, she either cited the same text more than 20 times, or didn't differentiate a bunch of texts by using 2007a, 2007b, etc. Why not a simple: "Quotations in the following section are taken from Mystery 2007" ... ?