You should totally write a letter to the New Yorker to tell them this. I work in publishing, and it really brightens our day when we hear stories like yours.

I’m living on mostly rice, these days, but still subscribe to the New Yorker.

Her genius is never letting his name skip past her teeth. She is demoting him to the base animal he is and deserves to be thought. You only hear proper names in praise from her. Hillary she praises, “Barack” (her term not mine) she praises, Bill she praises. If you notice she also only uses their first names as to…

My husband’s phrase for this is looking like a soup sandwich. I think that perfectly describes Trump’s “look.”

Can we take out a full-page ad telling all people everywhere who have ever existed this?

“The closeted perv has never come out as gay”

Because he very well may not be; being a child predator /= gay. Abusive sex is about power, not identity.

Plus she used fractions, which probably count as witchcraft to the average Trump voter.

I LOATHED Sarah. I actually can’t think of a book I’ve disliked more. I thought it was precious, pretentious crap — overwritten, shallow misery porn that read like bad slash fiction and had no underlying message beyond “Look how deep I am and how much I have suffered!” I was — and am — baffled by adulation it received.

This is MX-410. He is canon.

Mee mother mee moo moids moo midenmimied mare mot mammom mexammles.

So damn good. Just looking for gifs got me all excited for the show. And it ended right when it got hella interesting too.

Nary a mention of her turn as Sofie on Carnivale, brings a tear to my eye.

I admit, I am fascinated by this man’s almost pathological need to publically humiliate himself. That documentary was both the most I’ve cringed and the hardest I’ve laughed at a movie all year.

My unsolicited advice, Bobby: if you don’t care, don’t Carol

Going to guess you aren’t disabled. Virtually all of this country’s equality law has been enforced by European courts. There goes that.

(former forensic nurse here) While I have no specific knowledge of this specific case, I have been involved in others like it, and my understanding is that the physical evidence collected at the hospital is consistent with a digital or foreign-object penetration. The reality is that no one can really say conclusively…

I’m really trying to understand this friend’s point of view. She’s terribly inarticulate, but I THINK I have pieced her argument together. It seems to go something like this:

...good for blowing your load AND loading your blow.

Drug mule throws shoe.