I've had an ongoing debate with a friend who insists that InBev's ad was successful, in that it solidified its base and will be good for customer retention. But I'm of the belief that, for one, the company is hypocritical as it acquires craft breweries to maintain market share in the growing segment, and secondly that…

Oh, you can know, but you can't always move fast enough. Especially when booze is involved.

You guys did invent poutine, though, so you get a few bonus smugs for that.

Someone had to do it ...

Perhaps Canadians are so smug they don't even realize they're doing it. Perhaps.

It's completely tacky and in poor taste to go on a rant about the dislike of other an-air personalities. No class what so ever.

This is all horseshit. Your faux outrage in this instance, and dislike of other on-air personalities, is severely misplaced here.

Yeah, all those newspapers out there making so much of a profit ...

WTF does this have to do with "main stream media?" And what does media in general have to do with cops kicking the shit out of people?

Probably a pretzel, too, which can easily be mistaken for a beating stick.

So what you say? La di da?

Good retort.

I think you should look up the definition of "logic."

You put the stupid words in your own mouth, not me. You seem to do that a lot.

I keep "coming back" because you've done nothing to sway the argument, except repeat ad hominem the drivel from the police department. You're wrong because your bias won't allow you to think outside of a narrow view point that allows for no grey area, only black and white, right and wrong, dead or alive. In this case,…

Heh, right, I give a shit about likes and anyone who has a different opinion must be wrong. Heh. It's OK, because I don't give a shit what you think. Heh.

No, you had it right with sarcasm. Again, learn what straw man means before you continue undermining yourself. There is no burn. Why? Because you're talking to yourself and I didn't read your laborious and tedious screed. In other words: YAWN.

You really should learn the definition of "straw man" before you levy the claim, because I did not use a straw man argument.

Yeah, you are. Just come out and admit it already. You're thrilled that a black 18 year old young man is dead. You said it yourself — you're glad he's dead. So you get to decide, without any due process whatsoever, who deserves to die. If you're a christian, you're going straight to hell for being a calloused bigot.

There were witnesses, but they didn't fit your narrow narrative of big black scary black kid. Oh wait, he was 18, so that means you're a scared cracker who shoots the black kid because you're scared and "defending" your tiny penis.