Explore our other sites
  • kotaku
  • theroot
    vci
    VCI
    vci

    I’m more concerned about the guns and loot. BL2 was a crapfest of whites and greens with the best guns tied to bosses and golden keys. BL1 would drop oranges in crates and you’d see a purple nearly every game session. You might play BL2 20 times and never see a purple drop in nature. Succckkkkeeedddd.

    I appreciate your understanding.

    If that’s your takeaway. So be it. Sorry for any rudeness on my part. I’m honestly trying to stay away from internet arguments from now on.

    Sounds like we don’t have an argument. Which is good because I’m giving up internet arguments. I think you are a good person and don’t want to be in a fight with you about something. Peace be with you.

    What an amazing story. Thank you so much for this.

    Saw the movie. It was good. But I don’t remember her bending over so much.

    “when comic book movies were still goth-industrial, campy, or some unsightly combination of the two.”

    Purposes are not inherently subjective. Quite the contrary. Purposes are objective. I mean, if your misunderstanding is that fundemental, I’m honestly not sure you should read the sources I cited. They assume a basic understanding of language and the scientific method. Something you keep stumbling on. And I have yet

    I agree. Things don’t need a purpose. I have thrown no fits. I’m just educating a keyboard warrior. I believe information should be shared. It’s important to squash ignorance where it is found And your comments are full of it. I’m just doing my part to help you.

    I didn’t start an argument. I made a comment that was not to you and didn’t have anything to do with you. I am not offended in the least. And for some reason you felt the need to demonstrate a complete lack of knowledge or understanding of the subject matter with false statements and lazy straw men. That’s textbook

    I’m bad a trolling. Ok, sure. You’re pretty good at it. There we go.

    There is no contradiction if you actually know what the words mean in a scientific context. I think that is the problem. Your knowledge base is too limited.

    I already get it.

    I’m not repeating anything like intelligent design. You must have as little understanding of that as you do about biology in particular and science in general. Saying that an evolved and inherited trait serves a biological purpose is not intelligent design. It’s the difference between cause and effect. This is

    I’m not sure what you mean by a “feature” of biology. If something goes extinct, it’s biology probably failed in some way. Failure is not generally considered to be a feature but perhaps you’d like to expand on that with some reference material. I read this stuff all the time so if you have a book or scientist who

    I’m not at all resistant to the idea that things can “just be”. I wonder if you actually think that concept is contradictory to the scientific reality that things biological elements have a purpose. It isn’t. Maybe on a very simple level it might seem so. But if you understood the subject matter and how words work in

    Here here. I’m honestly a bit dumbfounded. It’s usually quite the opposite.

    You’re right. The only logical outcome of this is the abolition of sex-segregated sport. We can’t have it both ways. I make no value judgments on this. People can decide what they want. If they want to protect women as athletes and provide the same (or as best as we can muster) opportunities as men, then we must

    I think we are rapidly approaching a point where there will be no more women’s categories in sports. In a world seeking perfect equality, there certainly shouldn’t be a special category for lesser competitors. Everyone should be equally subject to win or loss based on their own personal abilities. If you agree with

    Pretty sure your money was already lost on that one. Please crawl back under your bridge. Or, in true troll fashion, keep cursing and calling me names. I can take it. Internet bullies don’t scare me.