Re-badging. I mean, what’s the point? The people who might believe your 330 is an M3 don’t give a crap, while those who know cars and are impressed by M3s, can easily figure out yours isn’t and thus, you instantly become pathetic.

Whenever an SUV-driving friend visits me, I tell them every piece of furniture in my house was delivered in my 9-5 wagon. (It is mostly true actually)

Comparing this to the CTS-V is like comparing a McDonald’s burger to filet mignon because they’re both beef.

I thought it was great! Cool car, no manufactured drama, lots of wrenching and detailed explanations/tips from Edd. Really hope this gets picked up!

Thank you so much for writing this article, completely agree with everything. But it’s hard to argue with and change stubborn Joe Consumer’s opinions...

Generally true, but of course there are exceptions. Take the Volvo 240 Wagon: it’s a ‘No’ on all counts, yet values are steadily rising.

Why-oh-why do Average Joes and Plain Janes hate low ride heights so much? Okay, I know the answer, but I STILL don’t get it and probably never will... (sigh)

As those born in the ‘70s and ‘80s accumulate wealth, they’ll naturally seek out the cars they lusted after in their youth. So Japanese and other desirable Euro imports will continue to rapidly appreciate, while most muscle cars and vintage ‘50s-’70s Americana will probably flatline. Hot rods will probably depreciate…

IMO that generation IS had one of the coolest gauge clusters ever:

It’s my firm belief that true car enthusiasts are the ones who don’t seek out the fastest Porsche, Ferrari, Lambo, Mustang, Corvette or what-have-you, preferring instead to find the lesser-known forgotten gems. We need more diversity and originality out on the roads.

Speaking of underdogs, a wagon variant of a defunct brand (Saab) surely qualifies, especially when it looks stock but has a bit of tuning going on under the hood... (ssshhhh)

Always ;)

How does a very low-mileage 302 hp Volvo V60 T6 R-Design for about $35K sound?

Most mid-size Euro wagons of the ‘90s and early ‘00s had a maximum cargo capacity between 65-80 cu.ft. Now, the same models are 55-65. The E-Class, V90 (vs. V70), and A6 Avant have all lost more than 10 cubes in the past 20 years.

It’ll be on CL soon enough. “Gently used tractor trailer, low miles, interior near mint, non-smoker, always serviced, just needs minor engine work.”

Also, roads are rarely smooth, so when the car is moving up and down, so does your finger. Good luck landing on the exact virtual button you want on a touchscreen. Toggle switches, knobs, levers, thumbwheels (or anything physical for that matter) solves this issue.

Considering Fiat’s quality control at the time, I suspect it could’ve been that way since new.

Our dated road infrastructure simply isn’t ready for autonomous driving systems. We are still lacking basics such as smoothly-paved roads, clear markings, or adaptable digital overhead signs like they have all over European freeways.

I’ve noticed this as well. I live out in Palm Springs and it’s even worse with all the old folks and tourists. 3 cars spread side-by-side on all 3 lanes going 25 mph in a 55 zone? Yep, happens routinely. Seriously, even LA drivers seem brisk and sharp compared to here.