They were using infrared in the helicopter so they didn't stop the search as soon as it was dark. And it sounds like the neighbor's property is a large wooded area, not just a little yard in a suburb. They mention that the infrared was picking up a lot of animals.

The article I read mentioned that he was in a wooded area, so it doesn't sound like we're dealing with a suburban area where you look over the fence and there's your neighbor's meticulously mowed lawn. The neighbor's property was likely acres of wooded area.

The two things would only be remotely equivalent if male circumcision involved the removal of the HEAD of the penis itself instead of just the foreskin.

Then how does she explain Mike Tyson being treated as a great big teddy bear even though he's a convicted rapist and spousal abuser who also chewed a guy's ear off in the ring?

Yeah, this is my main issue with this teacher. This is a 7 year old kid. You do not have the right to post images of my child on the internet without me knowing about it. That's all there is to it.

I felt like an asshole thinking it, but my immediate reaction was the same as yours. I understand the school's position that they can't deny a child her right to an education. But at the same time it's clear just from the comments here that this goes beyond requiring every single other family to change their habits…

This is why I had to stop watching the show. It relegates the reality of polygamy in this country in which old men in positions of authority trade teenage girls like chattel to the Juniper Creek folks, who are obviously the villains of the show. The reality is that twelve year old girls are being raped by fifty year…

This is why I had to stop watching the show. It relegates the reality of polygamy in this country in which old men in positions of authority trade teenage girls like chattel to the Juniper Creek folks, who are obviously the villains of the show. The reality is that twelve year old girls are being raped by fifty year…

I doubt that very much, considering that the original article makes it clear that he was in possession of videos of several children and not just Carr's. I'm fully in support of her sentence, but I find his paltry four years to be disgustingly vile. And his other punishment, which is a lifelong prohibition from…