It’s classic network dillema. First V2V module is useless. The second one makes both of them at least somewhat useful. The more of them there are, the more useful they all become.
Vashvashvashvashvash
vash007
A local welder had a really impressive custom setup on his work truck. The bumpers were replaced with custom made ones that were basically pipe that was welded shut on both ends (common enough). There was a second AC compressor fitted on the engine that was used to compress air, and used the bumpers as tanks to store…
There is that whole “alone” part. Dining with women is fine, as long as there is more than one.
This is where it aliens fishy. I thought that cars were getting more expensive because we could afford them, as we were getting richer. If we aren’t (and there is decent evidence that we arent) why are we willing to spend a larger portion of our income on them then before? If we weren’t, we’d be buying the cheapest…
Good point.
Most cars bells and whistles are the equivalent of embedding a smartphone in the dash. How much does a smartphone cost?
That might be part of it, but it can’t explain the whole thing. If wages are flat, why are cars getting more expensive? Consumers weren’t willing to take 7 year loans a decade ago, why are they willing to now?
It’s an issue worth discussing now,but I feel that it’s rather important to figure out what it is that’s happening. There are two rather different possibilities.
Not too terribly long ago, over 50% of the population was involved in some aspect of food production. Today, our food is made by about 2% of the population. This is possible due to an enormous increase in productivity largely due to automation using machines that we don’t call robots.
The uber vehicle was hit in the side. That’s not conclusive, I admit, but it is rather suggestive.
Maybe you are really obsessive about HP/Weight ratios.
If a car themed boat makes sense because it might use some engine parts, why wouldn’t a car themed bicycle make sense if it uses CF manufacturing techniques.
I’m all for comparative negligence, but it’s hard to see how Ubers refusal to pay a $150 fee caused someone to run a yield sign.
Yes. Here is the line I should have quoted
Is Jalopnik studying accidents now?
I think Putin would prefer a weak US president to a friendly one. From his point of view, it’s best to release just enough info to keep Trump mired in scandals and unable to act then it is to get him impeached (assuming of course that he has such info)
He might have been told to come out and say something. Fall on a sword for your party sort of thing.
As I understood it (and please tell me if I’m wrong) a human driver ran a yield sign and hit the AV in the side. I think the in the side portion is telling, since it suggest that there as nothing the AV could have done to prevent the crash (it was already in the intersection by the time the car started running the…
Why are we constantly bringing up the autonomous accident? Was there something it’s operator could have done? Would the accident been any different if the vehicle was not autonomous?