I’ll read it and decide. Methinks you’re the one making the spurious assumptions, not, you know, trained scientists following any available evidence.

You believe in the dumbest, deadliest ideology of all time, and will dismiss this comment like a coward, while I eat two bagels. What a hell of my own making. 

Um. We don’t know if we’re making kid’s lives worse. We don’t know if we’re making them better. Do you understand that the science is not settled? Do you really comprehend that? That ZERO benefits were found by the Europeans? Does that make them bigots and terrible parents? You mouthbreathing fuck up??

Oh, and I’m always citing it simply because it reports the Europeans findings. Again, the science is not settled. Your litany of articles can be countered with just as many from Europe about WHY THEY ARE STOPPING THIS. But I guess all caution to the wind! Fuck them! We pick the science we want! THAT’S HOW SCIENCE…

I’m not responding to all this mess. I clearly stated it was a metaphor for mental capacity, not to be taken literally, you thick-as-the-London-fog-dense motherfucker.

Yeah, you’re not coming across as miserable and pedantic and bitter at all lol.

Another day, another communist totally dismissing science. How predictable. How did Lysenkoism work out again? Do you even know what it was? It was literally communism-based agriculture. Lysenko actually believed that plants who lived closely together would cooperate with resources.

Um. Okay. What do bigots have to lose by the left using less radical and more accurate language, precisely? You are asking people to “lose” reality. So I guess that’s it then. They have to lie to agree with you. Great strategy. Working great, so far.

A fuck you very much for calling me a bigot. I work with people from all walks of life and would never generalize, as people are FUCKING INDIVIDUALS and TRANS PEOPLE ARE PEOPLE WHO ALL DON’T HOLD THE SAME MONOLITHIC VIEW ON THIS. Which tells me you don’t know that many, or only to speak to those on your ideological…

Actually, I’m quite fucking adamant that my 7-year-old nephew not be allowed to be a storm chaser, nor would I TRUST HIS REASONING that’s it’s a good idea. IT’S A FUCKING METAPHOR FOR THEIR MENTAL CAPACITY. And I’m sorry, my “sudden concern for stormchasing”? Have we ever spoken before, you disingenuous asshole? If…

Yeah, methinks you’re a troll, but whatever: If you’re 18, go chase storms. If you’re NOT AN ADULT, you cannot chase down tornadoes in your fucking sedan. Happy?

For fucking children? Yes.

And you wonder why there are TERFs.

Hey, this poster used it incorrectly. Or did they?

I’m mentally ill for being against racist stereotyping and simply citing European scientists. That must make you MENSA. 

P.S.- Bruce Gilley was defended by Noam Chomsky. Why the two are practically Fox News contributors.

Yeah, neither of these men are rightwingers. You are calling professional scientists right wingers based on YOUR beliefs. The biologist was talking about BIOLOGICAL SEX, NOT GENDER, and Bruce Gilley was a long successful political scientist and economist. These are clear examples of progressives cancelling…

To I Miss Splinter:

No. They are not. Sex is determined by gametes. Period.

It’s trolling to post directly from European health authorities reversing course on transitioning minors? What would you consider not to a troll?