No evidence of what? That they are genetically inclined towards violence because of lower IQs, and higher MAOA, which is reflected in FBI statistics?

>so they are demonstrably bad.
Not an argument. That's an opinion. One not based on facts or empirical evidence. All nazi is, is nationalist and socialist.

No, it's an opinion not based on empirical facts or evidence.

Not an argument. The same thing happens - in reverse, for the alt-right.

Not an argument.

They're trying to de-legitimize them, by mis-characterizing them. The only thing the media *ever* does. They think they can show them as terrorists to change their image, since the public reeeeeee'd so hard about Islamic arabs being shown as terrorists.

I smell a non-argument coming.

So we take AP's advice to call the Alt Right white supremacist, because of their actions and associations, and how the public views them, but not BLM for their actions, associations, and how the public views them?