There’s also the fact that direct purchases undeniably mean better content for everyone. When you’ve got loot boxes you can get away with having 1 great skin and a dozen crappy ones because people will disregard the crappier ones in an attempt to get to the good one, which has lower odds. But with a cosmetics store,…

Wouldn’t you rather just be able to buy what you want? I think cosmetic MTX in $60 games are never going away, but they feel far less predatory when you can just go to a shop and pick whatever skins or hats you want rather than rolling the dice in hopes you’ll get that rare Junkrat outfit you’ve been craving.

It’s possible for something like this to not be causal and yet still be wildly tasteless.

Couldn’t be argued that it’s not trying to “suppress” content like this because it would fix the problem. But instead, it’s a normal reaction to content that has very little understanding of the subject and very little merit in expressing it?

actually a two-and-a-half long sculpture

Just because we know for a fact that playing or watching violent media doesn’t instantly make you homicidal doesn’t mean we should shut down any and all topics of how art effects our views.

So you’re saying video games don’t effect us in any way and there’s no reason to look at how art influences people because that only leads to video game being blamed for mass shooting?

Congratulations for an argument that makes no sense whatsoever. I mean, how is reporting on a game that is abut a school shooting a mere couple of weeks after the last one “giving away the argument” that video games cause mass shootings?

Wha? There is no was the suspect vehicle was made any more recently than the eighties.

Oh God, just fucking stop. Stop giving the away the entire fucking argument to people who want to blame video games for mass shootings. I don’t care if it’s insensitive. So was Postal. It has nothing to do with what’s in good taste. It has everything to do with how these demands for “sensitivity” every time a game, or…

around the same time that shame disappeared or became and ugly word. we are free to do or say anything......the internet fucked ruined us

Nah, I hate to disagree with my fellow Bears fan (the right Bears...) (also: it’s a complete lie that I hate to disagree...) but though I’m far from being even one of average Jalopnikness, I’m definitely seeing an early ‘70s two-door, “Charger-ish” body style. And, while I’m not sensing Jason’s possible vinyl roof…

That is so outrageously untrue in the time in which television has completely abandoned teaching you anything in lieu of simply airing endless “reality” shows. But do keep yelling at those clouds.

Not a single YouTuber on the planet makes “great content”.

Don’t make me laugh so hard, no way that car is newer, Jason even says that in the article. This is why I avoid the front page, thanks for reminding me.

GS is a likely candidate too.

Are you drunk? lol

Something like that, these ten year olds coming up with much newer cars are making me laugh!

Wrong decade

The car in the photo appears to be a much older. Besides the overall body style, another indicator is how far inset the wheels are compared to the fenders.