A Subaru marketing specialist was with the Subaru spokesman, adding: “We’ll be sure to revise the styling to ensure it’s visually reviled for the first two years, as well as engineer the engine for another three horsepower. We’re sure this will cater to the people actually putting money down for the cars, as well as…
I’ve worked at the gas station and I saw my fair share of ridiculously bad behaviour. I won’t say it was the majority, but enough people struggled at the pump that if you see something, you’re going to want to say something.
When the car says it comes with a dog box you’re going to have to double check to see if they mean transmission, then.
I wonder if they could get that kid who played Han Solo in Solo in this Solo, solo. Maybe an aftermarket tuner would get a hold of it and lower the suspension a little bit for whatever reason, so you could have a SO low Solo, driven by Solo from Solo, solo.
Honestly I could live with a tattoo that said small charcoal grill. Shame she changed it.
Cheers!
Seriously all these suggestions are viewing gold.
I second this. We definitely need Foodlopnik. Tracklopfood? Foodtracknik.
The quality of forums seems to be directly correlative to make and model of car applied to said forums. Car stereotypes exist for a reason.
If they compromise and wind up on clutch replacement only, I think the owner could walk away without feeling cheated. Clutches that can tolerate torque from a 5.0 V8 are not the cheapest in the world, and it’s clear that the joyriders messed it up somewhat. I agree that brakes and tires would be debatable.
What’s the weirdest thing that’ll fit in those saddlebags?
This one kept coming around my internet viewing habits for a while back in the day. (Yes I know it’s a photoshop)
The only way to salvage this movie is not to embrace B movie cheese or Pixar esque cheeky one liners and predictable heartwarming plots.
Yeah, exactly. That sounds pretty simple for a low volume or niche maker to do.
You can get touch screen sensitive gloves, but they’re not very warm due to the tradeoff.
Software engineering timelines won’t be much of a factor in the scope of choosing a hard button over a touch screen. The code for touch screens and interfaces already exist, just like engineering plans for physical buttons already exist. At a high level, I’m betting they’re going to go on cost/ease of…
I’m betting that touch screen controls are cheaper to build and deploy at scale nowadays, since that’s just one less mechanical part to engineer directly.