When keeping it real...goes wrong.

Would you want a convicted killer anywhere near another human being? Because they also get released and they can live anywhere they like.

No no, often the laws are named after the victim and not the perpetrator. People will misunderstand the name. So it needs to be called something like ‘Never Forget Brock Turner Is An Unapologetic Rapist And Got Away With A Slap On The Wrist Law’

Sure. You have to look at how we’ve changed how we’ve defined rape over the years, as well as how we’ve changed how much we care about it.

Definitely intentional but there are also plenty of valid reasons to oppose mandatory minimum sentences in general. Legislators who may be opposed to them may not have been able to do so with other crimes for political reasons but could do so here (which would be bad in its own right in terms of what it says about…

Like many of the olds (I am 40-something) I blame everything on the Internets.

They looks for pleas.........

I hate sanctimonious assholes like this guy.....

You got that impression because Pepsi kept implying it.

Holy shit - this is just a straight forward informative post explaining the answer to an interesting question. Well done.

“Mr. Trump, are you playing Pokemon Go?”

I don’t get the people who don’t get the PA one. First of all, you aren’t required to know exactly what NAT is. I don’t, and I think it would be less funny if i did.

And yet those thousands involved in this particular war, together with thousands of independent pilots, beg to differ.