If it's the same jury as the NFL case, they'll convict her and sentence her to one day in jail.

Part of the characterization of Sherlock is that he takes everything in a glance, so there wouldn't be anything noticeable about him noticing the machine. They would have to have set a trap based merely on him being in the same room as the machine, and somehow time it to when they figured it out. Plus there were…

Ah, good old Guilt By Association.

It seemed like the way the gang kept being a step ahead of them was leading to the reveal that there was a leak, and I was surprised that Sherlock still hadn't clued into that even by the end of the episode. Is that going to be in the next episode? I'm not sure whether it's going to be a mole or some sort of…

According to Wikipedia:

Was the conversation at the police station? It would be rather odd for a non-imaginary person to be just wandering around the police station.

Out of six.

The key word that people leave out is presumed. Someone who hasn't been proven guilty isn't necessarily innocent, but they are presumed innocent. Supposedly. In reality, they are still presumed guilty for things like bail hearings and the like.

Both of you are engaging in bad faith, but "ignorant baby raping gobshite" wins over "race baiting trash" for the "insulting people on the internet just because they don't agree with you" award, especially since it follows a string of straw men. Throwing temper tantrums and blocking people when they disagree with you…

Enigma machine encryption of data hidden in social media posts with key settings transmitted by window blind configuration. It's quite clear that the plot was driven by the writers wanting to show off rather than any semblance of practicality.

You know what else is online? Public-key encryption programs.

Watson nearly got poisoned due to being around Sherlock, and there are probably other cases that I can't think of off the top of my head.

That's exactly someone who is doing so would think.

More than being around Sherlock?

Holmes and Watson took that red herring motive of wanting to eliminate the competition to win the reality show way more seriously than they should have. Someone would have to be willing to kill for a million dollars, think they would get away with it, think the reality show would still pay out with a suspicious death,…

Suzanne Vega?

Was the gambling on the black market, or was it legal gambling (e.g. casinos)? If the latter, I wonder whether she has a cause of action against the casinos.

You are confusing "Your comment makes no sense" with "I don't understand your comment".

That's not a logical conclusion from Humanist John's post. His post is consistent with claiming that there is a single objective interpretation, but it is also perfectly consistent with saying that his interpretation did not include a judgment about LGBTQ, therefore whether that judgement is there is a matter of…

I was with you in saying that Stewart et al's schtick is problematic, but insisting that it is exactly like Hannity/Rush is going too far.