I think that T-bag is a horror movie villain, and he just generates a horror-movie-rules field around him. He can't be killed, he can't be kept locked up, he not only can survive having his arm cut off, but then go on to overpower a healthy man. He probably also has off-screen teleportation powers
UWIR
uwir--disqus
Is this recursive sarcasm?
Or maybe it's his car, and the teenagers let him come along because he's the only one they know that has a car.
Are you sure you don't just own a license to run the software subject to various restrictions?
Apparently, Randall believes that my favorite Netflix show is Narcos, Marco Polo, Orange Is The New Black, or Stranger Things. How arrogant. Come back when there's an Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt game, internet.
I suppose next you'll tell me that after I replaced my axe handle, then replaced the head, it wasn't the same axe.
Yeah, while the "zombies" on iZombies eat brains, have a pallid appearance, are apparently impervious to injuries other than headshots, and can pass their condition on to others, they're really pretty much zombies in name only, as long as their brain pipeline stays open. You could replace zombies with vampires,…
Well, they should correlate. Be a reasonable proxy is another thing.
The very fact that you're calling it "pops" tells me that you're not ready for it.
Not to be confused with West Side Story, a fictionalized version of the Columbian drug wars.
So you both make, and enjoy, cheese?
Actually, that's something else they have in common. RI is 44 by population with 1,056,426, and Montana is 45 with 1,042,520. So while RI has much higher population density, their total populations are very close.
"You've made it very, very clear that you care nothing about facts or reality"
Why is that when a woman accuses Assange of rape, you accept it without question, but when a woman accuses Clinton of rape, you dismiss it as "fucking bullshit"?
The idea that Roberts made up the idea that discriminating against states is unconstitutional is absurd, and based on your conduct, you're clearly not going to be willing to discuss your claim.
A woman accused Bill Clinton of rape. That is evidence that Clinton is a rapist. It's not proof, but it's evidence. You're a fucking rape apologist.
You're the fucking lying one. Comey said "there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information". He clearly said that his decision to not bring charges was based on not being able to prove that Clinton's violation of the law was knowing, not that she didn't break…
In another thread, you went on and on about my not posting a cite of Clinton making bigoted comments and declaring that it's such an absurd claim that it should not even be listened to, and then slunk off when I did post the cite. And you accept the rape allegations against Assange without question, but when a woman…
You're an atheist, therefore you can't be supporting bigotry against atheists? And you're calling MY post a non sequitur?