This is a great point. However, you go onto do defeat yourself with your leftest, left, left, left, left, left statement.

It's not possible to kill a cop in other Western countries?

"george carlin would have hated lmao"

I don't foresee any appeal.

You specialize in trans actions?

Post your password, and I'll see whether I can get it working for you.

Yeah, but they only allow five, so if they're already used up by the person you're stealing Netflix from, there's no way to use that feature. Unless you're willing to, like, pay $10/month or something to get your own account.

"the law couldn’t be invoked to prosecute people who violated Myspace’s terms of service"

If you're referring to a red squiggly line under "dystopian", that's your browser, not Disqus.

Wow, the conversation lasted an amazing number of comments before the inevitable mindless buzzphrases "sensible gun control" and "assault weapons". Starting a conversation with the phrase "sensible gun control", thereby making it clear that anyone who doesn't think exactly as you do just isn't being "sensible", is not…

The shooter only needed one gun. The only number of guns less than one is zero. So if you think that the problem is that "there are simply too many guns", then you're literally calling for a blanket ban on guns. Do you really want to live in a country where it's impossible to kill a cop? Really, seriously, think about…

Nice Wild Overgeneralization, there. Always good to make everything into Us vs. Them.

Tangentially related, but not completely different. And presumably the person who allegedly used the phrase "unmarried neckbeard sexist loser" is a woman. Is it really necessary to resort to misrepresenting the post?

Yeah, if it had been a Caucasian and an African American, it wouldn't have been an allegory for racism, it would have just been racism.

So is "D'oh" rendered as "annoyed grunt"?

Can they be YouTube autogenerated subtitles?

So how much editing of this was there? Presumably they cut out the parts of her typing her responses into the machine. Or did she pre-type them before the interview started? Either way, it seems like much of the spontaneity was artificial.

Didn't they already do this scenario? Was there another show that had people meet with dates whose profile pictures were different of other people, or is WWYD recycling their premises?

I don't see Decima as being in maniacal cackle territory. They aren't doing stuff for the sake of Teh Evulz, they have a particular agenda and are making carefully calculated moves to further it.

AI is immune to all sorts of our faults.