uuman
Uuman
uuman

A good story or game is good whether you agree with the views or not. I think a lot of stupid people see this as anti-capitalist. It isn’t. At least any more than, say, Borderlands is. Which has used a similar premise from the start.

Because there is llanned future content. It’s an rpg. Further levels will be earned. Character and item growth happens at a specific % based number every level. So, if an item is broken now at lvl 50 and drops bosses in a clip or less, how much more OP is that weapon going to be on its current growth curve in 10

Here's the problem: you took items which were unintentionally overpowered and then made a build around them. Whats more, you involved broken mechanics they have repeatedly said they intend to fix. And now you're crying after they said three weeks ago that they were going to nerf them. Good job. Do you think you

Or, in the case of BL2, every build involving specific items across all classes. DPUH was a given for pistols. Pimpernel was a given for snipers. Butcher or Interfacer for shotguns. Sandhawk for SMGs. ARs were useless. Creamer, Ahab or the nuclear Torgue launcher. You could have any build you want... so long as it

Think that was the idea, though on Mayhem 3 they now give less. Went from 6-10 down to 3-5 like you get on normal. Though they are still more common. Or they bungled the hotfix for the event, which wouldn't be shocking.

Borderlands 2 did events before Destiny even came out. Just not week after week of them. That’s likely simply due to being the series’ 10th anniversary. Granted, they were mainly loot hunts. Those, they continued on in BL2 right up to the release of BL3.

The return is great, but the initial start is tedious beyond reason. I started coop, then created another character and played ahead solo. I did none of the side quests on Pandora unless they were directly in path for the story missions. I hit Promethea at lvl 7 and being under-leveled by 5 lvls made it more fun. By

Dude made shit up and embellished as much as he reasonably could. That much was clear. Take Two would've happily had him removed otherwise. Gearbox is a privately owned company, but Take Two is their publisher and has the power to make them do what they want. It's not like Gearbox has beeen churning out winners

Worth pointing out they were college roommates and friends. Randy did put him on the payroll when he really wasn’t qualified and paid for him to get his law degree. Relationships like that never end well bc the lines were blurred before they formed. Most businesses try to avoid those situations these days, but the

Borderlands also has rare spawns with rare drops. It’s just that 90% of the loot is world drops, so it can be found in or on anything. Say you want a Butcher... you can find it any where, but i’ve had it drop twice putting it at like a 0.06% drop rate. Both of those were non-elemental though. So if I wanted one in

You look at his IMDB, but can't see his first non-translation role was in Brothers In Arms? Who made that? Gearbox. He was established in anime, you might argue. DBZ and another role... But there's a difference between the over the top VAing you see in anime and more mainstream VA roles. In that regard, Gearbox gave

To clarify Gearbox’s last line in that statement, Troy was long ago cast in the Brothers In Arms series which they developed. It was relatively early in his career as one of them was his second job in gaming. He would do a few more games for them before blowing up and becoming one of the biggest names in voice work.

Except they have union actors in the freaking game.

He was offered the industry standard and refused, claiming he was entitled to the money 2K gave him for what Randy's other company is producing for them.

Except for those other union actors who worked on the game you might be right...

Huh. I rolled through 9 lvls w/ a white Atlas AR. I have a lvl 50 blue version now for when i run into mobs resistant to my equiped elements. From 8-18 and 36-43 I was happy switching up green Maliwan Quasars.

They actually already addressed many of the performance issues in the actual patch yesterday. One reason they do hotfixes is bc it allows the players to still play if these changes break the balance of the game. Just limits you to offline or local coop. Its also far cheaper for them to use hotfixes for things that

Redefining something already well established and is straight forward is ridiculous. The only ones who seemingly can’t make these calls are the ones responsible for enforcing them. Which means their time would've been better spent training those people to enforce them properly.

It's less that I like it and more like 'If it allows them to make games w/o predatory microtransactions I'm happy to see it and if done properly it can aid immersion.' You could easily put up Pepsi billboards in GTA6, play actual current trailers in the cinema and such w/o forcing it on players. This game is a bad

Let us be clear: This is a CIVIL suite and not legal one. The NFL should have no place or decisions to make in regards to a civil issue.