uuman
Uuman
uuman

Except they have union actors in the freaking game.

He was offered the industry standard and refused, claiming he was entitled to the money 2K gave him for what Randy's other company is producing for them.

Except for those other union actors who worked on the game you might be right...

Huh. I rolled through 9 lvls w/ a white Atlas AR. I have a lvl 50 blue version now for when i run into mobs resistant to my equiped elements. From 8-18 and 36-43 I was happy switching up green Maliwan Quasars.

They actually already addressed many of the performance issues in the actual patch yesterday. One reason they do hotfixes is bc it allows the players to still play if these changes break the balance of the game. Just limits you to offline or local coop. Its also far cheaper for them to use hotfixes for things that

Redefining something already well established and is straight forward is ridiculous. The only ones who seemingly can’t make these calls are the ones responsible for enforcing them. Which means their time would've been better spent training those people to enforce them properly.

It's less that I like it and more like 'If it allows them to make games w/o predatory microtransactions I'm happy to see it and if done properly it can aid immersion.' You could easily put up Pepsi billboards in GTA6, play actual current trailers in the cinema and such w/o forcing it on players. This game is a bad

Let us be clear: This is a CIVIL suite and not legal one. The NFL should have no place or decisions to make in regards to a civil issue.

You ignore the NFLPA's role in this. Board members said they had to defend his right to play regardless of what the accusation is. At least until evidence comes out. Otherwise, you set a precedent and allow the big boss the ability to suspend someone based on any accusation before evidence surfaces.

These have all been pc copies and pc builds have always varied and offered numerous technical issues. The 'don't play on a dx12 build' is a clear statement in regards to known technical issues.

You’d have to pay me to trust most gaming ‘critics’ reviews these days. That said, the lowest two I’ve seen so far has been a 63 (hates the franchises humor, loves the gameplay, but not enough of his preferred end-game content) and a 77. Rest have been all over the 80s.

So the daughter who physically abused him, set him up w/ the guy who also abused him and stole millions from him as well as other bs, is upset she didn’t get a call from Marvel or Disney when he passed? Wonder if she considered this was at Stan’s request. Or if they figured that, after such poor treatment from her,

Generally, I’ve sided with Epic on this issue. Beginning to change my opinion though. That’s largely bc they’re following the Netflix expansion model where they buy up everything not nailed down.

$18 is too much for a cosmetic imo. $170 is far too much, period. F2P or not, that's a huge overreach. Any ingame item that costs you as much as 3 new AAA games... jfc man. There's no excuse or justification for that, ever.

Bc coop development cuts heavily into resources that make single player games what they are. It’s never just ‘Add another player character.’ It creates narrative issues. It also creates balance issues. Even in the case of exclusives, coop cuts heavily into actual content.

Yeah, right, sure... except this was done by the publisher, not the developer. Meaning Randy had absolutely no say in what has been done. He could've triggered these events, but so could anyone who watched his videos.

Hyperbole has its place. If it didn’t, your comment could be labeled offensive. It’s not about saying the most vile things, it’s about being allowed to express yourself. Let me give you an example: Driver A makes a dangerous and illegal maneuver, Driver B honks and yells a profanity in response, Driver A goes to the

Because, as you touched on, ESPN is a sports network. People are tuning in to view sports news, not political commentary. There are far more and better informed sources who specialize in those fields.

Bringing back an actress who underperformed and had wanted out before being cut is probably a mistake. Doing a story which tanked in sales is probably a mistake. Marvel/Disney has had a strangle hold on theaters for years now, so they can afford to gamble, but I’d still prefer they hold off on this story. Recast or

Sure, but their two largest markets don’t have that much interest in soccer. And both complained loudly.