I owned one. This price is gibberish.

Super funny that everything you have “guessed” about me, in every way, is entirely wrong.

I enjoy the sound of a lost argument.

I’m enjoying your replies, which have continued to move away from attempting to explain how you’re right (you aren’t, and it’s delicious to see your points disappear right before your eyes) into weak attempts at insults.

So, you can’t read, or you’re choosing not to?

Because you are a shill garbage liar, I’ll again repeat again what I said from the start.

Your garbage points focus on a narrow potential win (emissions!) and ignore all the baggage that EVs bring, which is substantial. All of the baggage, from the financial, environmental, and political, aptly demonstrates how EVs…

awesome point

So, now you’re disagreeing with a Jalopnik post? This is yet more proof about how the EV fad is simply not ready for prime time.

You’ve ignored all of what I recently posted while acknowledging at least one major drawback about EVs.

Dunces like to dunce, so here’s an article (from yesterday!) that explains, with citations, some of my points. I’m even going to paste a small section for you.
“The electrification of cars addresses some, but not all, of the problems posed by the largest models—but it also creates new ones. Electric cars do not use…

We start with the best response ever, LOL.

You continue to play stupid games, and people like you need to be shouted down, as loudly as possible, because you’re wrong, and bad.

I adore how you continue to completely fail at delivering an argument that has merit or any basis in the real world.

As you like to play silly games, I have no problems showing you how stupid your points are.

I don’t really know what you’re saying in that first rebuttal point, but here’s a take on the IRA: “The legislation provides a $7,500 tax credit for electric vehicles that uses battery materials domestically extracted or processed. The bill might even encourage U.S. battery makers and suppliers to develop and source…

That cute article is, again, completely divorced from reality.

Would you like e to point out for you how it completely sidesteps the things I said above to make a narrow point that might, possibly, sort of, be correct?

A fine example again of a) how far Jalopnik has fallen, and b) how bad your initial argument was

This is an excellent comment, and the OP will likely ignore it. EVs are currently not ready for prime time.

Or, and stay with me on this one, dunce, trips of over 42 miles are actually pretty common, and often involved driving through places that have cold weather. Or inclement weather. So, a hybrid is (and has been, and will be) the best answer for a long time.

Now, this is a MUCH better argument than the original dunce made