If I wanted to play Skyrim or watch Game of Thrones I would... you know, do those things.

Witcher 1 is something that everyone who’s played it seems to agree that they love it, but at the same time it could use massive improvements in so many areas.  A remake could really work out well here, though I’m still going to be cautious.

If ever there was a time for AMD to shine, it would be now.

They don’t have an option to pay for those roms on Steam, as Nintendo isn’t making that an available option. Again, look at Sony. They finally started putting most of their exclusives on PC, and lo and behold the PC market is supporting those ports.  How it must offend you that people will gladly support developers…

Why would it offend someone to support developers?  Emulation is rarely about playing games for free, rather it’s about having more choice in the hardware and systems that games are played on.  I mean just look at Sony’s decision to support PC ports, the PC community is more than happy to support developers when they…

“That’s no PC tower, it’s a graphics card.”

Can the app be duped so that people can register multiple Authenticators? I think the purpose of the authenticators has always been account security, and not so much to prevent people from registering multiple accounts.  Could be wrong though.

All tier implies is a ranking amongst other months which is also a personal take with no implication of objectivity.

The phrasing you’re using is still odd, tier especially implies a certain amount of objectivity.  It would be more clear to just plainly say that you don’t like the titles.

Yeah, the quest thing in particular isn’t even a tip.  You’re going to come across that guy anyway while doing main quests, and from there it’s just a personal decision whether or not you listen to him, walk away, or just blast him.

I think for planning builds it’s good to keep the 3 OS systems in mind, and know which one you’d like to go for. Getting the OS systems with the higher stat requirements is an asbsolute game changer.

There will eventually come a point where characters come out which won’t be immediately available to Overwatch 1 owners.

I mean I’ve put like 25 hours into it so far, already I’ve gotten well worth the $30 I spent.  What, I’m going to get bored of it at the 40 hour mark?  Not all that harsh a criticism I think.

Criticizing the company is cool and all, but you also seemed to be criticizing anyone who’s buying these games.  Like I’ve really liked the Witcher games, and since I bought Cyberpunk 2077 recently I’ve found it hard to put down.

Unless I missed something, Overwatch 1 players are only getting the first 3 new heroes for free.  Once they move past Kiriko, Junker Queen, and Sojourn, won’t Overwatch 1 players need to either grind or pay up in order to gain access to new heroes?

Also, at least a couple of the MOBAs, an arguably adjacent genre, only let you play a handful of characters at any given time, so this isn’t the worst thing in the world?

Not sure if every live service shooter puts non-cosmetics behind a paywall.  I thought with Fortnite at least the battle pass was cosmetic only, that would be a big difference.

You made a point that he shouldn’t expect ‘to take his own slice’, I took that to mean he should just give money like a charity. Unless Dunkey is just filthy rich, that’s not sustainable and he needs to make that money back somehow.

I don’t see anything that qualifies him to get involved in the development side other than his wealth

Capital alone would be a good way to help people make games.