urbanachiever-old
UrbanAchiever
urbanachiever-old

Futuristic neurological sex helmets that convey all the fantasy and physical response of sex, but without any actual touching or exchange of fluids.

Sometimes it's just the angle of the photo shot. It's probably my age, but there are a lot of actresses I can't tell apart these days, esp. the younger starlets. I read recently that Glenn Close gets mistaken for Meryl Streep. I hadn't noticed the Octavia-Sherri similarity, but now that you mention it, I guess they're

Older sister of Oopsie, right?

Those are inches. 67 inches. 5'7".

Coffee is just a nice beverage with the same effects as a cup of hot water for me.

Yes! Early up, like to stay up late, and love to sleep around midday/early afternoon. My ideal pattern would be: Sleep from 2am-6am, and from 11am-2pm. 7 hours, broken into two blocks. But societal norms do not agree with me. :-(

Uh, with the exception of being attacked by a middle-aged homeless woman in Berkeley, CA - which doesn't count as groping, just plain old assault - all my gropy, sexual assault, narrowly avoided rapes, really scary encounters have been with middle class white guys, aged 15-65, usually in settings I would have

To paraphrase Forrest Gump: Racist is as racist does.

Super sentimental sappy comment alert! But you asked for it.

Naw, he's popular here in France - I just don't think he's been taken particularly seriously as a dramatic thespian. More of a comedy actor.

I think we'd have fewer celeb shenanigans and wannabees if more interviews were this kind of No Holds Barred.

Read up on how Ronald Reagan de-funded public education (a policy continued by most of his Republican successors), and this will further help understand why people are losing their critical thinking abilities to judge how they are being manipulated. No Child Left Behind indeed.

Go fuck yourself.

Unfortunately, this is an easy question, and I'm going to assume you asked it in earnest.

And then "a handsome man enters the room..."

Hey, LC, normally I don't respond for this long to self-righteous commenters in need of self-validation, but I will say this: Your argument doesn't hold water, it is fundamentally anti-choice (abortion okay in cases of rape or incest, i.e. involuntary sex, but not okay in cases of voluntary sex is not giving choice to

Maybe if he was going...Kommando!

Maybe if he was going...Kommando!

My whole point, LC, is that this movement has chosen to self-define itself in this way just so you, as someone who disagrees with them, gets painted into the very corner into which you are describing. The term 'pro-life' was chosen by the anti-choice movement for the very reason that it forces the pro-choice movement

So, you are anti-abortion, but support the constitutional right to abortion services. Fine, I don't think anyone has an issue with that stance.I also support those constitutional rights, but I am not anti-abortion. I am also "pro-life" because I support the wonderful notion of life in general, not because I don't