Target already has security and measures in place to prevent that - like security, the cashiers may decide to refuse to sell the item to the person that took it from another person's cart and as far as I know, they can even ban people from their stores. They have the measures in place that work well enough to prevent…

No. You see there is this thing called intelligence. There is this thing called freedom. I will stand for freedoms defending things that I wish didn't exist. Like religion - I despise religion, but I stand for everyone's right to have the freedom to follow a religion if they so decide.

Reading the comments made me lose all faith in humanity. Everyone here wants to live in socialist communism. Fuck freedom. Fuck privacy. Fuck everything. Communism is the way to go.

Let's send a bunch of immature kids to get fucked in the ass by drug dealers. I am with you! That will teach them compassion and not ruining other people's fun.

People don't understand how things work. This week you go to jail for cheating, next week you go to jail for using a FoV fix.

Just to clarify - you said that modding is illegal.

Yeah, every time anyone cheats in an online game, the company has to hire a team of crack scientists to fix the client. Every time after someone cheated in a game, all legit users must reinstall, otherwise they will get the flu on their machines.

The EULA/TOS in games means nothing, though. Wherever the law conflicts with the TOS, the law comes first and the TOS gets dismissed. The terms of service do not give anyone the right to overrule laws.

Go fuck yourself. In sports, using steroids is not a criminal offense. What happens in sports is you get banned. Should using steroids be criminal offense? Nope. Neither should be cheating in games.

If the last was an actual videogame protagonist, I would be reading on this very site what a sexist game that is for objectifying women like that.

It's cheesy at best. It's like when two ideologies argue, and one brings Hitler in - it's just cheap. The Witcher 2 did something similar, but I think they went one step further - they made the player uncertain whether or not what Geralt did was good or bad, often forcing him to choose between two evils. That game…

Of course. Making shit art is not taking a risk, it is just being shit. The Hitman trailer in question however is far from shit. I'm generally not a fan of games about women in their panties, but that trailer in particular is one the best, if not the best representation of fetish culture in games to date. Simply…

All risks are risks we ought to be taking. Artists should be given complete freedom to do as they please, without worrying that they may annoy any particular interest group.

I think with MK you have 2 things - MK is famous for comedic violence and the violence is not focused exclusively on women. With the Hitman Absolution trailer (which I loved, mind you I love fetish nuns), you have fetish ladies having the crap beaten out of them for no particular reason, and you don't have any context…

My point exactly - if you stay out of it, you can remain neutral. But if you want to be involved in some dispute, you need to know where you stand.

Decent countries have much more to offer than this binary choice. :P

I actually addressed that - the only way you can remain neutral is if you take on both sides or not get involved. If you don't get involved in the conflict, you don't have to pick a side... but especially with a war - you either pick a side or you stay out. You either pick The Horde or The Alliance, or you do not…

I think I found this video hilarious for all the wrong reason. One in particular being the black kid that had subtitles.

Eh, you don't get to help the 2 armies in a war. Of course you'd say I am being unintelligent. Try to have a football match with 2 players being neutral.

By "limiting your interactions" I think you mean "I engage everyone in this thread".