uranus
Uranus
uranus

I'll elaborate - every time you make a generalization, regardless if it is positive or negative, about any group of society that is defined by traits beyond their control (sex, race, etc. etc.) it is racist, sexist, etc. -ist, unless you can back it up with empirical data. Like women generally have vaginas isn't

Because the word 'analogy' is too sophisticated for the likes of you.

I don't know how "cis" is used in chemistry. I googled it and I found that cis in the context of chemistry has entirely different meaning than it does in the context of gender self-identification. So no - they're not morons. I didn't know that cis was used in chemistry, thank you for pointing that out. :)

Yes, it means exactly that. It is when your gender identity matches your sex. So every male who is content with being male... is cis male. That is all it is. The origin of the term comes from one moron doctor, who mutilated the penis of a child when he wanted to circumcise him, then said that he could raise that child

I find it interesting that you'd say that because of an obvious joke. The joke was so obvious, that it is sad that you need to have it explained. It is about arbitrary preferences about how we should refer to groups of people. Now, the OP claims that referring to females as females is somewhat insulting, it

You think that women are as unfunny as a generic tumblrette and can't take a joke? I'm happy to see that you assume women suffer from the same inability to understand a joke that you suffer from.

Everyone who uses "cis-" seriously is a moron in my book.

Go back to tumblr, you moron. Now, what the passed out people had in common was that they were all females. Their gender identities are irrelevant to the article, mostly because they were passed out... you know, you can't ask someone about their gender identity if they are passed out. So yes - they were females

Biggest hypocrites in the world. Yapping about natural balance, then distorting it by causing lightning storms. I don't have time for hypocrites.

In a war, you have to pick a side, or stay out. There is no option. The moment you insert yourself in a war, you either have to be able to take on all sides, or pick a team.

The only thing that pisses me off more than the enemy in a conflict is the people who want to be part of the conflict but refuse to pick a side. Grow some balls and choose a side or stay the fuck away. Neutrality is for pussies.

Well, she lied about her kickstarter. Then you have her saying how objectification is bad... unless she is sending letters asking for donations, that end with a picture of her in a strapless dress, showing epic cleavage. She is a full-on hypocrite, confirmed fraud and a liar. I still consider her a smart person, but

Of course. This again speaks to her intelligence. She is not stupid. Her disabling comments and ratings enables people to actually respond to her. Because they have to do it in videos, and some ridicule her, some refute her points, some agree with her, but the emotional responses and rape threats are extinguished.

Or at least, if you insist on being mean, be mean in people's faces. Be confrontational. Go up to this boy's face and say "You so fat, you have dollars in one pocket and yen in the other and what THE FUCK is this? A GBA? What, did your mom trade in food coupons to get it for you?!" Then, when you see the person feel

I know, right! Why the fuck does he even get on public transport when he can just roll down the street, am I right?!

Anita is terribly smart. What she says on games (and on pop culture in general) is totally asinine (except for her third (I think) Tropes vs Women, the one about being a woman is a characteristic in games, and bows and stuff, that one is... actually good. For the most part, I agree with it and to the best of my

This should be called "The 12 games available on the PS4" instead.

Their eyes look like they have a secondary eyelid. That is not how reflections work.

From the head of Anita Sarkeesian - this game is sexist, because you play a woman housekeeper, which we all know are gender roles that just have no place in modern gaming. Much like how women should never be punched in games, they should never be in stereotypical roles as well.

Anita stinks. Once again, she is completely detached from reality and takes shit out of context to portray her point. The problem is that when I know that she takes things out of context to make her little emotional snippets, I can't take anything she says seriously. At around the 13 minute mark, she shows a clip from