As someone that regularly finds older, chubby dads attractive......no, he is absolutely not.

I’d be willing to do that as well, but unfortunately, in my state you cannot vote in a party’s primaries unless you are registered to that party. And since I like voting in the primaries and having a say in who ends up on the ballot, I have to stay a registered Democrat.

Personally, I think everyone should be able to…

“Tomatoes are fine when they’re mixed with high fructose corn syrup, but I can’t handle that spicy oregano!”

Yeah, in a reasonable, not sexist and absolutely ridiculous country, this testimony would cost him his current position as a federal judge, but here in America, it probably won’t even cost him a promotion.

I would never conduct myself like that, much less at a job interview. But, then again, I’m a woman, so if I raised my voice and interrupted people like he did, I’d be a bitch.

I dunno, do YOU get black out drunk? Huh? HUH?

Good question. I’d like to add: Should Supreme Court Justices need notes from their lawyers reminding them not to answer questions with a question? He’s literally being assessed, and answered a question about getting black out drunk like a fucking child, only to be handed a note from his lawyer, and then apologized…

Wait, no, I just looked it up and apparently he puts ketchup on his spaghetti, and in the context of that statement, I think he was saying spicy foods make him vomit, which is why he puts ketchup on pasta?

He seems to really enjoy drinking beer for someone with such a sensitive stomach, though. I was disappointed that…

He also deflects most questions about his drinking by pointing out that he went to Yale. He got into Yale! He played sports! There’s absolutely no way he could have gotten black out drunk at Yale!

How have I not heard of this ketchup thing? Also, did he actually insinuate that spaghetti sauce is spicy?

I think the democrats are doing their best, I guess, but holy shit, Booker made me so proud.

There are good Republicans, but they voted for Hillary Clinton.

Did you even read this article? Or do you really think having a women-only panel to discuss how women are systematically excluded, harassed, and targeted is somehow a perk? Do you think they were having some party with free cupcakes and just wouldn’t let men in out of spite? Are you serious?

Another group (men) are…

How are your struggles at all relevant? You have not had the specific struggle of living as a woman, and just because you’ve had different struggles doesn’t mean that you have valid, constructive input for a panel discussing the exclusion of women.

Stop trying to make this about you. You do not know what it is like to…

Yes, you should be able to, but because men and women are not equal, you cannot swap “women” for “men” in any situation and have it be the same.

That said, men have already made an event that excludes women, and this panel created a space specifically for women to discuss how to include themselves in spaces that they…

No? You think that being nice to women and fighting for equality, which are the very basic things you should be doing if you’re a decent person, should somehow afford you access to women’s personal spaces?

And you even still consider yourself an ally to women even though you can’t seem to understand why they would not…

Except she is being punished; she was charged with the actual crimes that she committed, and will serve jail time. Additionally, these two men could both sue her damages.

As for indecent exposure and solicitation, those are both legally considered sex crimes, and are usually forms of sexual harassment.

And no, she did…

It was not a violent crime. Full stop. It was malicious, it was racist, it was beyond horrible, but it was not a sex crime. It was not violent, not legally speaking.

And, no, the sex offender registry is not intended to be punishment. That would be cruel and unusual punishment, and would violate the eighth amendment.…

No, she did not. Using sex to assault someone’s life is sexual assault. What she did was not sexual nor violent. It was not assault. It was a malicious lie, character defamation, slander, corruption of justice, and filing of false reports. None of those sex crimes, having the lie be sexual in nature does not make it a…

Except she did not commit a sex crime. Sex crimes are, by nature, sexual and violent. She lied, obstructed justice, and filed false reports. Those are her charges. And if these men so wish, they could very easily sue her for defamation and emotional and financial damages.

But none of those are sex crimes. She did not…