unicornz
unicornz
unicornz

For me, it’s that sudafed, and other efadrine based stimulants/decongestants knock me right out. I had a doctor one tell me that was impossible. I wanted to be like “give me a sudafed and watch me.”

perhaps you could go on twitter and/or google and then come back with specific questions?

I could make a technically accurate statement that Hitler’s Final Solution brought millions of Jewish workers to labor camps in Eastern Europe, but if that’s how I’m going to describe the Holocaust in a textbook for kids, it certainly would not be passing on the relevant information.

It’s also because he really, really acts like a dick in the show. They miscalibrated that. I don’t find either of them more or less responsible, I just find his personality to be very selfish, plus misogynistic and patronizing to the woman who is supposed to be falling in love with him. He just seems sleazy.

I imagine most affairs are not relationship enders. I have both been cheated on an cheated in relationships, and that didn’t end them (although they ended for other reasons.) Many of the men in my family have cheated on their wives and it is kind of accepted, although not openly.

Humanism is an alternate view to theism, or religion and faith. I’m a Humanist. I am also a Feminist.

One of our wedding guests was shot (he’s okay) and couldn’t make it. Another got called into work and said he couldn’t get out of it (I think he actually freaked out about seeing his ex and therefor bailed). People bail. Regardless, it costs WAY more to attend a wedding for most people than the per-person cost of a

It is interesting that Glossip and Willingham have gotten much more press than other likely innocent death row cases , and Gissendaner, who is guilty, has gotten the most. I think this has to do with race and gender. We are more squeamish about killing white women than white men; we have very little sympathy for

Absolutely. And even Kennedy has been hinting at his 14th amendment issues with capital punishment. I actually wouldn’t be surprised if the current court abolished it (neither, evidently would Scalia). Unfortunately, it is gonna take some more martyrs (like possibly Richard Glossip this afternoon) and it’s also

Yes! This is so important! People often become apathetic about politics because the federal legislative branch is such a cluster fuck. But judicial appointments at all levels affect our lives as much or more than anything the congress and president do in their roles as law makers.

When a criminal commits a murder, it is a horrible, depraved act worthy of punishment. However, I do NOT believe the death penalty is the appropriate punishment, for many reasons.

Barack Obama was against gay marriage in 2008. And look what happened? The death penalty will be overturned by the courts, not the congress, and so it will be judicial nominees that matter. I doubt Sanders nominees would differ that greatly from Clinton’s (or Obama’s). The two Clinton appointees on the court (Breyer

Sorry, should have read government.

Many victims prefer not to have the death penalty.

Nominate more supreme court justices. Nothing different.

Huh? This is what is called a strawman argument. You are arguing against me by arguing against a position you claim I’m taking. However, I am not taking that position.

Wow, am I glad you don’t vote. Keep not caring my friend. We need more people with your opinions to care less.

To me, it looks very similar to where gay marriage was 10-15 years ago. Popular support is dropping. States are banning or de facto banning. And Brennan and Marshall laid out a pretty good argument for using the 8th amendment in Furman, but even the other Furman opinion of inconsistent application is so ripe to be

Also, while you are right about 60% supporting the death penalty, that isn't dissimilar to those against gay marriage only 10 years ago. Plus 19 States have either abolished the death penalty Or never had it, and 17 states have de facto moratoriums as the investigate abuses. So less than a third of states actually

It could easily happen in a manner very similar to the gay marriage decision. The Supreme Court could rule the death penalty cruel and unusual.