When dead children are found by authorities, it is usually made known to the public - especially to the parents who file a missing child report that matches the description of the body. And I think we both know that this is not what you were alluding to in your initial comment; RFID chips won't help you (or the…

No, the RFID chips that the shelter or vet puts in your dog or cat is not a GPS tracking device.

RFID chips (such as those used with pets) are not tracking devices.

Laws require that bouncers / ID checkers verify that IDs are legally valid - it isn't up to the people checking IDs. Bars that get busted admitting underage people carrying non-valid IDs get cited. So, it isn't that they think that you have expired, it's that they (understandably) have no interest in assuming…

I certainly looks that way.

So, women are pulling razor blades out of their vagina in public? And / or posting photos of the act online?

IT'S REAL.

The Goldie Blox case was not considered fair use - their suit to have it determined fair use was dismissed - and they ended up having to pay an amount settled out of court after the Beastie Boys filed an infringement suit against them. You might want to read up on cases before you cite them (inaccurately) to bolster…

Additionally, you clearly have a complete misunderstanding of the case regarding Goldie Blox and the Beastie Boys, and what the outcome was. Not to mention - since Goldie Blox changed the lyrics and used a new recording of the song, neither the original BB recording nor the song itself was used in its entirety in that…

Well, lucky for all of us copyright owners, your opinion does not determine how the laws work. "All rights reserved" means that the copyright owner alone owns the right to license use of their work. That's what copyright is. Why is it "stupid" for a copyright owner to own the exclusive rights to the use, distribution,…

My understanding is that you sue for copyright infringement because someone else is making money off something you would otherwise have made money on.

Standard procedure for any respectable tattoo artist.

The case is about how the school handled the situation with regards to her treatment via the university's clinic.

"Voluntarily giving your pricate medical records to your rapist without your knowledge or consent is another violation in itself."

So Marvel put them up to this, and is using the photos for self-promotion?

(Oh, I was replying to ChalupaBatwoman, who had told you it was an exhibit created by her - that's why my last sentence may have come off as weird to you, if it did. :^) )

All accounts I can find (including this story) credit MOMA's curator, Klaus Biesenbach, as the organizer of the show - not Bjork. It is a (mid-career) retrospective chronicling her musical work, but relies heavily on work by other artists (designers, video artists / directors, etc.). She may write and perform her…

Exactly. It is essentially an industry trade show.

Human babies are not "the world" (and human females are not "the origin of the world" - they are part of it). That is the OP's point.

The artists aren't being denied payment after performing the work - these are simply the terms that they are free to accept or decline.