"So... you condemn her for desiring to wear perfume in a restaurant." - No, I condemn her for her attitude that other people dining around her should be subject to the smell of her perfume, lest the restaurant be deprived of her business. Your reading comprehension skills are failing to a spectacular degree.

You absolutely are, as confirmed by your replies (not to mention your original comment). You claim she was banned. She was not. That's not semantics, that is pointing out that your statement was incorrect.

I didn't condemn her for desiring to wear perfume. That she insists that other people dining around her should be subject to it, lest the restaurant be deprived of her business, is selfish. I am condemning her for her attitude.

SHE was not banned. The wearing of perfume in the restaurant is banned.

She was not banned; as you point out yourself, "she could choose not to wear perfume".

Jan is a woman of many emotions.

YESSSSSSSSSSSSSS...

(I updated my reply to this comment - REFRESH! REFRESH!!!)

BECAUSE THEY ARE AMAZING AND YOU ARE NOW WONDERING WHAT LIFE WAS EVEN LIKE BEFORE YOU CLICKED "PLAY".

One of her more recent offerings:

The wearing of perfume being important to one's dining experience regardless of how it effects others nearby is what is self-centered, by definition. Believing that others should be subject to the smell of their perfume while dining shows the OP as completely lacking in empathy. That you are arguing the exact opposite…

She was not banned; as you point out yourself, "she could choose not to wear perfume".

How is it a waste of time to call a restaurant to ask about their policies before deciding whether or not to go there, when their policies would be the determining factor in whether or not you went?

A policy (regarding entrance, such as the one in question) is a policy, not part of the "dining experience" . "No shirt, no shoes = no service" is not part of the "dining experience", nor is "no perfume allowed". Additionally, that they chose not to go there at all clearly shows that there literally was no "dining…

HA! She definitely does. She is a singular force in this universe, and all others. Note that I did say that I think Jan still wins the race, though.. :^)

Even worse is the fact that anyone would think that a site called The Daily Currant is even an actual news source of any kind.

Let me introduce you to Jan Terri:

Wow - she's giving Jane Terri a run for her money...

Why would you choose to entrust such a place with your dog's safety?