You raise two points, in different posts, that seem to contradict each other: I'd like you to clarify.

Okay, so your argument is that a restaurant should be able to target any clientèle they want, and can do whatever they want to cater to that clientèle.

Would you agree with all of the following?:

The destruction of others (i.e. those working in the restaurant) is the ultimate infringement upon other people's personal freedoms. Thus, the government is protecting the personal freedoms of its citizens.

I understand your point. If I'm allergic to all trees, they're not required to cut down the forest for me to be a Forest Ranger.

Nope, there isn't a federal agency out there to rescue stranded fishermen from their occupational hazards.

And what about the people working there?

"I know that if Guantanamo's inmate population started to kill themselves in large numbers, the government would look even worse."

It's a good question whether it'll expand beyond iOS first or beyond USA first.

Sounds cool. Lemme look!

What? You hate Little Drummer Boy?

Reminds me of an old saying:

I agree that you have every right to swear as much as you want.

Is this the real life?

Obama also led with the part about her being brilliant, throwing in the looks stuff as an aside:

"If you think chiro is a placebo, then you're an idiot."

How do you refute Edzard Ernst's finding that, "With the possible exception of back pain, chiropractic spinal manipulation has not been shown to be effective for any medical condition."? http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088539240700783X

I've heard that many chiropractors are anti-vaccination. What is your take on vaccination?

From what I've heard, both are half-right, depending on who is requesting the report.

Mine was a 386 running Windows 3.11