You hit the nail on the head. Mutiny succeeds in spite of Cam not because of her. Her leaving is arguably the best thing that could have happened to the company. I mean, how many times in the past two seasons has she nearly run the company into the ground with her "my way is the only way" attitude only for it to be…

When has Cam ever really shown the willingness to compromise though? Hell go all the way back to season one and her fights with Gordon and Joe about the OS for the Giant.

Cam didnt want to discuss the situation. A discussion implies you are open to listening to feedback and adjusting your views. She just wanted everyone to agree with her and do her idea. Which is what she always wants which is why she is a terrible person to be running a business.

If you remember, Gordon's objection to Donna was about blind siding Cam.

Is it really THAT far off from reality? A relativly small group of people made some pretty huge contributions to tech in real life.

Honestly, the opening credits and Mackenzie Davis were the two things that kept me watching season 1.

you have made like 30 comments all basically slagging the show and Sam Esmail. One wonders why you even watch it.

i avoided this show for the same reasons. But its honestly nothing like what i thought it was and now might be my favorite show currently on TV.

The plaintiff appears to be alleging that an unpublished script they both wrote years earlier was used in the pilot for black-ish. That is by no mean's just an idea or premise. That is actual stealing someone else's physical work.*

Well the suit does more than just claims ownership of a vague premise (rich black family) it seems to imply specific ideas/work were stolen. That is something you could actually prove.

….yet you still read and comment on articles about it?

Unless it's not actually supposed to be producing weapons grade and is doing it in secret for the Dark Army.

It seems like a pretty big leap to think Price expected Angela to steal her bosses passwords, hijack his account, download the files and drop them off at the federal watchdog.

"are movie makers obliged to change characters" is a totally different argument. You are moving the goal posts now.

Amanda Waller wasnt sexualized because thats not part of the character. It IS part of Harley Quinn.

Thats not really true. In the 90's cartoon she was pretty sexualized considering it was an all ages cartoon.

They didnt "turn" the character into anything. That's the flaw in this whole argument.

Not at all actually. institutional sexism is obviously a problem everywhere, not just Hollywood. But pointing to Margot Robbie playing Harley Quinn (a notoriously sexualized character) is not really a great example of it. They didnt put her in hot pants just because she is attractive. They did it because it fits the…

"Can we stop using poor examples to illustrate institutional sexism" - lots of reasonable people

Fair enough. I was simply pointing out that anyone complaining about Harley Quinn being overly sexualized in Suicide Squad is wilfully ignoring the history of the character for the benefit of their own agenda/bias.