Shouldn’t it be the GT700+? Here’s a toast to hoping someone, anyone, at the state level starts requiring a special license endorsement for driving cars over 500hp. And over 70 years old. And an automatic banning if you’re over 70 and drive a 700hp car.

Yeah, but that’s only a theoretical rating.

Anything is only worth as much as someone is willing to pay for it.

So did you finish chewing and swallow?

There’s a video (because, of course there is) of a little kid sneezing while eating a big mouthful of spaghetti. He ends up with a strand dangling from one nostril, having threaded the sinuses to get there. Adorably creepy.

Top 15 Cars people can’t be bothered to trade in.

Zune was a failed product. Zima was failed product. Combining those names only spelled doom. What did they expect?

*Grabs popcorn for comments from conspiracy theorists...

Wonderful fucking timing Lockheed!! I just purchased a SR-71 last month! You know what, fuck the 72. I’m just going to wait for the 73.

Maybe it’s just a Star Wars location people forgot about it.

My knockoff was great, until the knockoff waterproof case became not so waterproof, after 2 mins 41 seconds submerged in the caribbean. Man those nearly 3 minutes were beautiful tho.

Thank you for visiting Gizmodo.com

At least his wipers won’t stick to the windshield. #silverlining

The graphs illustrated above stop at age 40.

The correct answer is to land on the person who just jumped before you.

♪ “Let it gooooooo, let it goooooo!” ♪

Frozen 2: Johnson Control kidnaps and tortures Elsa to obtain her thernodynamics-defying HVAC technology.

You actually wouldn’t. You want to minimize the deceleration on landing, having skis on would mean that the deceleration would be much higher. Taking them off would help you penetrate the snow and reduce the landing shock immensely. Just like crumple zones in a car actually.

the other chair did not put its keys in the fishbowl

I have no comment other than this picture I found when googling “shoes for ducks”: