they keep pushing these small motors at ever higher boost - longevity will suffer along with boatloads of oil dilution.  The SS1LE Camaro kills it and far more reliable, yeah yeah the interior - which cares 

Eye catching but not in a good way - becomes more gaudy the more you look at it. New C8 looks and performs better for much less

Sixth gen Camaro SS is infinitely more reliable and kills this junk in any performance test

Beat by a new Accord 2.0 (which is also far more reliable) - pretty sad

The 2.0T smokes it and the V6 weighs more so it's become a dinosaur with no advantage other than inferred high mileage reliability

Camaro SS is rated at 455 but routinely does 410 on a dyno - Camaro would beat this in any track tsst to boot

New Camaro SS beats it on track and it's more reliable (LT1) - 6.2L is just fine

how is it underrated? 15% driveline loss is typical - the standard car makes < 400 hp - underrated?

no turbo motor matches an n/a V8 for reliability - the Camaro SS beats the M4 on track too

370 rwhp for 8 years and counting, beating up on your beloved v8s

Finally, sharp edges convey lack of imagination, it's why Nissan keeps cranking out one fugly looking Transformers reject after another

Comparing the NSX to a Ferrari is laughable btw, unless it's the Testarossa Honda no doubt copied, another car permanently stuck in the 90s!

Whatever - ask 100 people on the street which car looks better (especially lowered with some nice 18s) - the FD RX-7 will win hands down, every single time. The NSX is permanently stuck in the ‘back to the future’ 90s but the FD turns heads everywhere