ughfine
ughfine
ughfine

As someone who also works in this industry, and who looks at a broad range of call sheets for commercials, features, tv, & reality series, I can tell you that those numbers for the camera department match what I see. And the divide gets worse the further up the hierarchy you go; there are some women working as Loaders

Pockets. Pockets in your pants! Pockets in your dresses! Pockets in your skirts! MOTHER FLIPPIN HIDDEN NINJA POCKETS TO STORE YOUR SHIT.

how about button down shirts that are sized according to bra size and waist size? For example instead of my usual large size shirt, it would be 36D / 30.

The "Not Rape" titty shot is classy and does not scream "I am desperate for attention" at all.

I mean Lauren Conrad seems like a nice person and all, but she has to realize she's built an entire lifestyle empire on "basic." This is a person who thinks anyone needs tutorials on how to make a sandwich or tie a leaf to a candle. She is Pinterest in human form.

All those clothes and she still picks a tacky outfit to wear on the air

NOBODY NEEDS A WHOLE SHELF FOR ONE PURSE!

"Not many women can wear denim overalls, strappy Louboutin stilettos, and a Navajo-blanket poncho and get away with it, but Blake Lively can. "

"But what about a five-year-old waiting just outside a supermarket?"

Now playing

Why stop with just declaring a fertilized egg to be a "living human"? (I think you might want to recheck the definitions of both "living" and "human.")

Not ala carte, you have to get the whole abortionplex package and it is expensive. It's worth it though because they have non stop reruns of Maude and Golden Girls.

See, now I'm just going to mock you for being so incredibly ill informed.

It smacks of "women can only be one thing". In this case, Tay Swift writes songs directed at teenage girls (who are considered silly and consistently undervalued), and therefore Taylor Swift is only allowed to do that one thing. She can't write a coherent article for the WSJ because she's only allowed to be one thing.

the people who work there, from cindi leive (EIC) on down, are pretty much uniformly smart, nice, and real, and that's why glamour can rise above the fashion thing to create real interesting content. but of course anna's the star, cindi's just a wanna-be in the Conde hierarchy, even though Glamour also sells a shit

'Vogue is what happens when the smartest girl in school gets distracted by something shiny and then quits school to chase the shiny thing forever.'

And like a caterpillar emerging from the chrysalis as a butterfly, the "basic" will eventually morph into a "normie" as she hits her mid-30s – Kate Gosselin hair circa 2008, a pink-and-brown quilted monogram bag purchased from one of her Zumba friends, and a wooden wall hanging in the kitchen that says "Faith."