Explore our other sites
  • kotaku
  • theroot
    ugggggggh
    Ugh
    ugggggggh

    Suffocated? How? Gotten his neck snapped!? Fucking how? And, yes, my favourite: someone runs out into the aisle in the middle of the bride's processional and stomps on the baby that everyone is obviously aware is there. Whoops! Yeah, that's incredibly plausible.

    A one-month-old infant requires support of the head

    Okay, can you please offer a plausible scenario in which the baby would be injured?

    "I think that this woman, and her staunch, obsessed defenders, are fucking stupid."

    Some unsolicited advice, Kate: next time you find yourself writing a blog post based on something from the Daily Mail, stop and reconsider your life choices.

    I've asked multiple people here to provide any reasonable scenario in which this kid could even be injured.

    Have you said anything about any of the blatantly racist comments here? No? Then why would I care about your opinions here?

    The things you are saying are just ludicrous. Please stop and actually consider the possibility that you might be wrong.

    Yeah, crazy me for thinking that people saying shit like "Is that English?" (14 stars) and "Was it the groom's child? It would be so much more hilarious if it wasn't." (16 stars with bonus reply "*GUFFAW*") are being racist.

    A substantial fraction of Catholics don't believe in transubstantiation, a basic tenet of their sect. Many religious Jews eat pork and Muslims drink alcohol. And while some of these people are being hypocrites, many of them simply disagree with some of the official teachings of the group they belong to. I'm sure

    Not all Christians are against pre-marital sex. You have no idea what this woman thinks about pre-marital sex or anything else. Your entire image of her is just the result of you plastering together some stereotypes about poor black Christian women.

    Was there any point to that Billy Eichner tweet besides "HARHAR THIS GUY'S GOT A FUNNY NAME!!!"?

    Seriously. If I, as a white atheist, were in a situation like this, I'd say, "Hey, I've thought about my actions and they're fine. You might not but, frankly, I don't give a shit what you people think." And if I did that, these same commenters would probably commend me for standing up for myself against a bunch of

    "This may be indicative of brain changes due to strong stimulation of the brain's reward pathway from watching pornography."

    I hope her Facebook post actually reflects how she's handling this. A bunch of racist, classist assholes from the internet (and The Daily Fucking Mail for god's sake!) come along and decide to shit all over these people's happy day. If they really are managing to not let that get to them then I'd be really impressed.

    The paper doesn't actually document a "decrease in motivation" though, does it? That language implies a causation running in one direction. It seems like the observed correlation between porn consumption and that motivational area of the brain could just as easily be explained by people with lower motivation having

    Yeah, you see, the friction of the dress rubbing on the carpet from the weight of the baby could totally have started a fire. Luckily they made it to the altar but that baby was about two steps away from being engulfed in flames.

    A quick look at the pictures shows that the groom, one of the audience members, and a frame on the wall switched sides too. They probably carefully repositioned the baby while they were reversing the entire contents of the room.

    You continue to dodge the question of what was so objectionable about how she talks. Fine, whatever, just make sure you don't do any self-reflection here. That's the most important thing.

    "But I'm also aware of a baby's fragile bone structure at this age, and if even one person made a misstep, this story could have had a profoundly different ending."