nice Mr2!

No, that’s just you pretending that’s what they think. They’re thinking “lol @ this bro trying hard”

I like how you’ve doubled down on how dumb and wrong you are.

uh. hahah what. you’re so wrong here.

This is already done, and has been done for decades to grow endothelial layers. That part of the paper isn’t novel.

lmao.

Good luck taking your Porsche 919 camping. Some people actually use cars for transport of things and people.

The consumer market isn’t 100% race cars who knew!?!?

Because it’s a super capable off road vehicle that will last 50 years?

Unlike the G-wagon.

What other detail? The juice part? Cutting the orange will always release juice. It’s an acceptable loss for efficiency.

You didn’t address that your solution to whatever machine this is built for is to have multiple people peeling oranges with a knife 24 hours a day.

Yeah I’ve never worked in a kitchen. Does that somehow make my points wrong? Is 10 seconds faster than 5-8 seconds? Against this machine will even the best orange peeler fall behind? Can the best orange peeler peel 2-3000 fruits per hour, nonstop, 24 hours a day as this seems to be designed to do?

The second video shows the total time is around 5-8 seconds per orange. Can you clear-cut the peel off an orange with a knife in 5-8 seconds? Furthermore, this is clearly designed for some industrial scale production, not to process a single orange at a time.

Is this a real question, this is clearly an industrial machine.

It has no ends, you didn’t watch the video and replied purely on the screenshot.

What.

...They’ve made literally hundreds of thousands of these per generation.

It’s not going to be worth more over time.

There’s no one I admire less than you.

Yeah! like the Nissan GT-R Nismo LM!

What is your degree, what school are you going to???

Bill Gates has like 9 honorary PhD’s, yet doesn’t have any official Bachelor’s. Do you think he isn’t deserving of even an honorary PhD?

Are you really calling an M3 with a V10 badge on the side panel a ‘super sleeper’ ?

...what.