I learned that the hard way when Antarctica Fats hustled me at a pool hall.

She had originally wanted to do it without the Mail Kimp spots, but they just didn't have the technology at the time.

"And I want you to know that when I die, you're all welcome to visit me in rich men's heaven."

Well, now I have to dictionary "google."

Good grief; I had no idea of the other ones. Anyway: "'Inflammable' means flammable? What a country!"

Sure, a reference to the Forrestal fire is quite clever, but can you work it into a Simpsons quote somehow?

The cube root of 1790 is 12.1418354718.

The secret to really good racist relative is brining the night before. Lets the meat stay moist.

Pardon me?

They left the round dish on the Falcon. Inexcusable. Middling Job, Internet!

"I don't like MS-DOS. It's coarse and rough and irritating and it gets everywhere."

That's number wang!

What's funny is the other day on HBO Go I was watching an old America Undercover doc on white supremacists, and all I could think of was Chappelle's "black white supremacist" sketch. Not that racist screeds didn't sound ridiculous before, but I'm pleased as punch that Dave Chappelle apparently permanently added an…

"It's greener!" they said, as they smugly patted their messenger bags full of Soylent Green.

I assume the "mostly" qualifier is a direct reference to Rob Ford and Jian Ghomeshi.

I'm also just going to point out how you can tell the framers knew they were permitting something very, very wrong with the way they pussyfooted around slavery by the way they worded the text. Besides Art I Sec 2's "three fifths of all other Persons," we have Art I Sec 9's "The Migration or Importation of such Persons…

Right, and the northern states wanted them to count as zero-fifths. I think the issue is that people mistake the three fifths thing; really the constitution would have been less-supportive of slavery if it said slaves weren't counted as people at all. I suppose maybe it's just too counterintuitive.

By counting them even as 3/5 it shifted congressional representation to the south at the expense of the north.

Reverse. It *inflated* the power of the slave states in congress (and also presidential elections because of the electoral college). Because slaves weren't allowed to vote—and were legally property for that matter—they shouldn't have counted at all.

Internet resources! I bet his name is "Zed McGlunk." http://en.wikipedia.org/wik…